Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Exam - Topic 2 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) exam

Question #: 107
Topic #: 2

[All Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) recently implemented Einstein Opportunity Scoring in its production org. CK is using the Amount field in its Opportunity Scoring model.

What will a user without access to the Amount field on the Opportunity object observe?

AThe Amount field will display an error in the contributing factors section.

BThe Opportunity Score field and the Amount field will be hidden for that user.

CThe Amount field will be hidden from the contributing factors section.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

In Einstein Opportunity Scoring, if a user lacks access to a field (such as the Amount field) that is used as a contributing factor, that field is omitted from the scoring details that the user sees. Salesforce respects field-level security settings, so users without permission to view certain fields will not see those fields in the contributing factors section. Instead, the scoring model will still display, but without the restricted fields in the breakdown of contributing factors.

by Denny at Dec 11, 2024, 02:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sharika

3 months ago

I heard the Opportunity Score might still show up though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

3 months ago

Yeah, it makes sense for it to be hidden.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

3 months ago

I’m not so sure about that, could be an error too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cornell

4 months ago

Definitely agree, it won't show an error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassandra

4 months ago

I think the Amount field will just be hidden.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hui

4 months ago

I feel like the answer could be C, but I’m not completely confident. I need to double-check how contributing factors work in relation to field access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamae

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused about this one. If the user can’t see the Amount field, does that mean they can’t see the Opportunity Score at all?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

4 months ago

I think I saw a similar question where access restrictions only hid certain fields, so maybe the Amount field will just be hidden from the contributing factors?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dexter

5 months ago

I remember studying how field-level security affects visibility, but I'm not sure if it hides the entire Opportunity Score too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is B. If the user doesn't have access to the Amount field, both the Opportunity Score and the Amount field will be hidden from their view.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. If the Amount field is used in the scoring model, and a user doesn't have access to that field, then the field will likely be hidden from the contributing factors section. That's my best guess.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know Einstein Opportunity Scoring uses fields to calculate the score, but I'm not sure what happens if a user can't see one of those fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clement

5 months ago

This seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is understanding how Einstein Opportunity Scoring works and what happens when a user doesn't have access to a field used in the model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyman

1 year ago

I've got to say, hiding the Amount field is the funniest way to handle this. Imagine the user's face when they see a big empty space where the field should be. Option C all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Julieta

1 year ago

User 3: Option C seems like the most logical choice in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonardo

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, it would be confusing for the user to see a big empty space there.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacob

1 year ago

User 1: I agree, hiding the Amount field is definitely the funniest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacresha

1 year ago

Yes, Mattie is correct. The Opportunity Score field and the Amount field will be hidden for that user.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rutha

1 year ago

The error message in the contributing factors section would be a bit confusing for the user. Hiding the field entirely, as in option C, is a cleaner approach in my opinion.

upvoted 0 times

Cecil

1 year ago

User 4: Yeah, hiding the field entirely makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

1 year ago

User 3: Option C seems like the best choice then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colton

1 year ago

User 2: I agree, the error message could be confusing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

1 year ago

User 1: I think hiding the Amount field is a cleaner approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerry

1 year ago

But what about the Opportunity Score field? Will that be hidden too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

1 year ago

I agree with Edna. The Amount field will be hidden from the contributing factors section.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alison

1 year ago

Hmm, hiding the entire Opportunity Score field and Amount field seems a bit excessive. I think option C, where just the Amount field is hidden, makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

Latonia

1 year ago

User1: Yeah, hiding just the Amount field makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerardo

1 year ago

User3: I think option C is the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

1 year ago

User2: I agree, option B seems too extreme.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theron

1 year ago

User1: I think option A is incorrect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

1 year ago

I think the user will not see the Amount field in the contributing factors section.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

1 year ago

If the user doesn't have access to the Amount field, I'd expect the Amount field to be hidden from the contributing factors section. Option C seems like the correct answer here.

upvoted 0 times