Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Exam - Topic 10 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 10
[All Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Questions]

Cloud Kicks has a Public Read Only Opportunity sharing model. A sales rep noticed they can edit some opportunities associated with accounts they own, but are unable to edit other opportunities associated with accounts they own.

Which reason explains the sales rep's experience?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Creating a junction object between Campaign and Opportunity is the best way to track which marketing activities influenced a customer to make a purchase. This junction object will allow you to track the influence of multiple Campaigns on a single Opportunity, which can be used to gain insights into which Campaigns are most effective.


by Gail at Dec 09, 2023, 12:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rachael
5 months ago
C sounds interesting, but I’m not sure how that fits in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
5 months ago
B doesn’t apply here, sharing rules don’t affect ownership.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
5 months ago
I thought all opportunities would be editable if you own the account?
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
5 months ago
Totally agree, A is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
6 months ago
A makes sense, some opportunities could be owned by others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
6 months ago
I thought public read-only meant no edits at all, but maybe there are exceptions? I guess I’m leaning towards A as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where account teams were involved. Option C sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like sharing rules might play a role here. Option B seems plausible, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
6 months ago
I remember something about ownership and how it affects editing rights, so I think option A could be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
6 months ago
Got it, that makes sense. I'm going with option A - "Some opportunities associated with these accounts are owned by other users." Seems like the most likely explanation for the sales rep's experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
Ah, I see. The answer is probably that some of the opportunities are owned by other users, even though they're associated with accounts the sales rep owns. That would explain the inconsistent editing access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
6 months ago
I think the key here is understanding the difference between account ownership and opportunity ownership. The question says the sales rep can edit some opportunities but not others, even though they own the accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question mentions a Public Read Only Opportunity sharing model, so that's a good clue. I'm guessing the answer has something to do with how opportunities are shared across different accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different sharing models and access levels that could be at play here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
7 months ago
I feel confident about this one. Based on the information provided, I think the most important drug recall is the one that requires notification to the doctor, pharmacy, and patient due to the potential for serious harm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
7 months ago
I'm not sure which resource would be the best to use here. I'll have to think about the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
7 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll try using u-substitution to integrate the function and see if I can match one of the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
7 months ago
This reminds me of a similar practice question where they emphasized due diligence before filing a SAR. I think asking Ms. O'Reilly first makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between two-factor and three-factor authentication. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
7 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the Linux operating system and the different types of worms that might be used in that environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
11 months ago
The correct answer is A, right? I mean, who else would be editing those opportunities if not other users? Mystery solved!
upvoted 0 times
Queen
10 months ago
C) The user is a member of an Account Team with Read/Write access on Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
10 months ago
C) The user is a member of an Account Team with Read/Write access on Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
10 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. Other users must be editing those opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
10 months ago
A) Some opportunities associated with these accounts are owned by other users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
10 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. Other users must be editing those opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
11 months ago
A) Some opportunities associated with these accounts are owned by other users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamie
12 months ago
Ah, the joys of navigating complex sharing rules. I'd need a flow chart to figure this one out.
upvoted 0 times
Tom
10 months ago
C) The user is a member of an Account Team with Read/Write access on Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
11 months ago
B) Sharing rules for Opportunities are set to a public group for managers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
11 months ago
A) Some opportunities associated with these accounts are owned by other users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cammy
12 months ago
I bet the sales rep is just trying to sneak a peek at their coworker's deals. Gotta love a little friendly competition!
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
12 months ago
The key seems to be that some opportunities are owned by other users, not the sales rep. The sharing model likely restricts access to those opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 year ago
But what if the sharing rules for Opportunities are set to a public group for managers? Could that also be a reason?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
1 year ago
I agree with Denna. It makes sense that other users owning the opportunities would restrict editing access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
1 year ago
I think the reason is A) Some opportunities associated with these accounts are owned by other users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 year ago
I think it could also be C) The user is a member of an Account Team with Read/Write access on Opportunities. That could explain the inconsistency in editing permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
1 year ago
I agree with Terrilyn. It makes sense that other users owning the opportunities would affect the sales rep's ability to edit them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
I think the reason is A) Some opportunities associated with these accounts are owned by other users.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel