New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional (AP-223) Exam - Topic 3 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional (AP-223) exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 3
[All Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional (AP-223) Questions]

Universal Containers sell boxes based on size, Price for a specific product is based on theselection of length and width and height, which cpq pricing functionality should be usedhere?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Louisa at Nov 25, 2025, 07:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional (AP-223) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Danilo
3 days ago
A) Percent of total could work too, but B is more specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
8 days ago
Wait, can we really use Multi Dimensional Quoting for this? Sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
13 days ago
Totally agree, that option fits perfectly for size-based pricing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
18 days ago
B) Multi Dimensional Quoting is the way to go. Gotta love that 3D pricing action!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
24 days ago
Haha, I bet the person who chose A) is the same one who thinks a box is just a square with four sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
29 days ago
A) Percent of total? Really? That's not even close to the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
1 month ago
D) Price Rule with lookup table could also work, but B) is probably more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 month ago
B) Multi Dimensional Quoting seems like the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 month ago
I’m confused, I thought percent of total was more for discounts rather than pricing based on dimensions, so I’m leaning towards B or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question like this before, and it was about using a discount schedule, but that seems less relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
2 months ago
I'm a little confused on the differences between the pricing options. Is the "Percent of total" just a flat percentage markup? And how would the "Price Rule with lookup table" work here? I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
2 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Since the pricing is based on the specific dimensions, I'd go with option B, Multi Dimensional Quoting. That seems like the most direct way to handle variable pricing based on multiple product attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about price rules being used for specific conditions, so maybe D) Price Rule with lookup table?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
2 months ago
B) Multi Dimensional Quoting is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
3 months ago
I think the answer might be B) Multi Dimensional Quoting because it deals with different dimensions for pricing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
3 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think option B, Multi Dimensional Quoting, is the way to go. It sounds like the best fit for handling variable pricing based on the length, width, and height dimensions. I feel pretty confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I'm not totally sure about the differences between the pricing options listed. I'll need to review my notes on CPQ pricing functionality to figure out which one fits best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
I think the key here is understanding how the pricing is calculated based on the dimensions. The question mentions "length and width and height", so I'm guessing a multi-dimensional pricing approach would be most appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
Virgie
3 months ago
I think a price rule could work too, but not as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel