MENU
Universal Containers sell boxes based on size, Price for a specific product is based on theselection of length and width and height, which cpq pricing functionality should be usedhere?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional (AP-223) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
LU
Lucina
7 months ago
A is too basic for this scenario. B or D is better!
AL
Aleisha
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards A. Percent of total seems simpler.
TR
Truman
7 months ago
True, Sherita. It allows for specific pricing based on dimensions.
SH
Sherita
7 months ago
But what about D? Price Rule with lookup table could work too.
TA
Tatum
7 months ago
I agree, Barney. It handles size variations well.
BA
Barney
8 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Multi Dimensional Quoting fits perfectly.
MI
Michel
8 months ago
I thought D) Price Rule with lookup table was the best choice!
DA
Danilo
8 months ago
A) Percent of total could work too, but B is more specific.
CA
Carylon
9 months ago
Wait, can we really use Multi Dimensional Quoting for this? Sounds complicated!
CH
Cherry
9 months ago
Totally agree, that option fits perfectly for size-based pricing.
CH
Chandra
9 months ago
B) Multi Dimensional Quoting is the way to go. Gotta love that 3D pricing action!
ED
Edelmira
9 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who chose A) is the same one who thinks a box is just a square with four sides.
PA
Pamella
9 months ago
A) Percent of total? Really? That's not even close to the right answer.
KA
Katie
9 months ago
D) Price Rule with lookup table could also work, but B) is probably more appropriate.
LI
Lisbeth
10 months ago
B) Multi Dimensional Quoting seems like the right choice here.
PA
Paris
10 months ago
I’m confused, I thought percent of total was more for discounts rather than pricing based on dimensions, so I’m leaning towards B or D.
SE
Selma
10 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question like this before, and it was about using a discount schedule, but that seems less relevant here.
LA
Lavonne
10 months ago
I'm a little confused on the differences between the pricing options. Is the "Percent of total" just a flat percentage markup? And how would the "Price Rule with lookup table" work here? I'll need to think this through carefully.
VI
Vi
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Since the pricing is based on the specific dimensions, I'd go with option B, Multi Dimensional Quoting. That seems like the most direct way to handle variable pricing based on multiple product attributes.
GR
Graham
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about price rules being used for specific conditions, so maybe D) Price Rule with lookup table?
RE
Rebecka
11 months ago
B) Multi Dimensional Quoting is the way to go!
JO
Josephine
11 months ago
I think the answer might be B) Multi Dimensional Quoting because it deals with different dimensions for pricing.
NO
Nobuko
11 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think option B, Multi Dimensional Quoting, is the way to go. It sounds like the best fit for handling variable pricing based on the length, width, and height dimensions. I feel pretty confident about this one.
AL
Alise
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I'm not totally sure about the differences between the pricing options listed. I'll need to review my notes on CPQ pricing functionality to figure out which one fits best.
NI
Nichelle
12 months ago
I think the key here is understanding how the pricing is calculated based on the dimensions. The question mentions "length and width and height", so I'm guessing a multi-dimensional pricing approach would be most appropriate.
TA
Tashia
6 months ago
It’s all about those measurements for accurate pricing.
EL
Elbert
6 months ago
Multi-dimensional is definitely the way to go!
EL
Elmer
6 months ago
Yeah, dimensions really matter for pricing.
AN
An
7 months ago
I agree, multi-dimensional quoting makes sense.
VI
Virgie
11 months ago
I think a price rule could work too, but not as well.