Salesforce Exam Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 1

[All Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional Questions]

What are the 3 common CPQ design mistakes to avoidwhile implementing CPQ for yourcustomer?

Ausing price book entries to handle attribute based variations instead of lookup price rules

Bdesigning the product catalog with SKU rationalization in mind

CCreating process buildersand flows to pass data between fields instead of using twin field mapping

DWriting customizations for product selection or validation instead of using optionconstraints,product rules,and bundles.

Edocumenting logical architecture diagrams for data flow between systems

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C, D

by Cyril at Jan 24, 2024, 07:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Revenue Cloud Consultant Accredited Professional Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dylan

11 months ago

I'm going with D as well. Why reinvent the wheel when the tools are already there? Plus, it's probably more secure than custom code.

upvoted 0 times

Lanie

10 months ago

It's important to prioritize security when implementing CPQ.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

10 months ago

Definitely, using existing tools is usually the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adaline

10 months ago

I agree, D seems like the most efficient option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

11 months ago

Haha, I can just imagine the poor developer trying to document all those custom flows. E is a waste of time, just use the out-of-the-box capabilities!

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

11 months ago

I agree with Marguerita. D is definitely the correct answer. Who wants to write custom code when you can just use the tools provided?

upvoted 0 times

France

10 months ago

I think using price book entries can also lead to issues. It's better to use lookup price rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valene

10 months ago

I always prefer using the tools provided instead of writing custom code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisandra

10 months ago

Definitely, using option constraints and product rules is much more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gretchen

10 months ago

I agree, D is the way to go. Custom code can be a headache.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nguyet

10 months ago

I agree, D is the way to go. Custom code can be a headache.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

12 months ago

Option D is the way to go. Customizations are a pain to maintain, but using the built-in features is so much easier.

upvoted 0 times

...