MENU
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) is looking to build an app for its logistics team where users will
be able to submit inventory refill requests. The current manual process involves filling out a long
form containing many fields. NTO is planning to replace the current process with Flows. Users
frequently change field values as they are filling out the form. What should NTO keep in mind
about letting users go backward in the Flow to make updates to field values?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium Process Automation Accredited Professional (AP-221) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
KA
Kallie
12 months ago
Yeah, I agree with the need for flexibility in the Flow!
ES
Esteban
12 months ago
Only certain users can go back? That's a bit restrictive.
MA
Mauricio
12 months ago
Wait, will users really lose all their current inputs if they go back?
KI
Kimberlie
1 year ago
Definitely, but it could lead to duplicate requests.
TA
Taryn
1 year ago
I think allowing navigation is key for user experience.
TI
Timothy
1 year ago
I vaguely remember that allowing navigation could create issues with duplicates, but I’m not entirely sure how that would play out in this scenario.
MI
Mike
1 year ago
I feel like there was something about needing to repopulate fields if users go back, but I can't recall the exact details.
LA
Lajuana
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question about navigation permissions, but I'm not sure if it was specifically about Flows.
BR
Brynn
1 year ago
I remember discussing how allowing users to go back in a Flow could lead to confusion, especially if they lose their current inputs.
CH
Chau
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The exclusive remedy doctrine means Mr. Pelham can't sue his employer for additional benefits, so the answer is C.
RE
Remedios
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is A. $set is the operator used to update a document partially in MongoDB.
ON
Oneida
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. MLD snooping is similar to IGMP snooping, but for IPv6 multicast traffic. I just need to carefully read through the options and identify the one that is not true.
NI
Nickolas
1 year ago
The final data storage options are the key here. I need to make sure I understand which ones are correct.
SI
Sina
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A as well, but Global Data Service Parameter Limit sounds familiar too. This is tricky!
YA
Yasuko
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. The question mentions the LTM Specialist reviewing the configuration, so I'm wondering if there's some specific setting or profile that would be better suited for this scenario. I might need to think it through a bit more.
KI
King
1 year ago
Ah, the joys of Flows. Where users can navigate like a maze, and developers can cry like a baby. NTO should just hire a professional Flow-whisperer to sort this out.
CA
Candra
1 year ago
D) Once the user navigates to previous screen, all field values on the current screen will be lost and will need to be repopulated.
SA
Sage
1 year ago
C) Letting users navigate from the later screen to the previous screen could result in duplicates.
FR
Francisca
1 year ago
A) Allow Navigation' needs to be set to TRUE on the Flow.
TE
Telma
2 years ago
B sounds like a power move. Only the chosen ones can navigate the Flows? Forget about that, I'm gonna hack my way through like the Kool-Aid man. Oh yeah!
FR
Freeman
1 year ago
D) Once the user navigates to previous screen, all field values on the current screen will be lost and will need to be repopulated.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
B) Only users with 'Navigate Flows' permission can navigate to previous screens.
PH
Phung
1 year ago
C) Letting users navigate from the later screen to the previous screen could result in duplicates.
BR
Bronwyn
1 year ago
A) Allow Navigation' needs to be set to TRUE on the Flow.
WI
William
1 year ago
D) Once the user navigates to previous screen, all field values on the current screen will be lost and will need to be repopulated.
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
C) Letting users navigate from the later screen to the previous screen could result in duplicates.
SE
Serina
1 year ago
A) Allow Navigation' needs to be set to TRUE on the Flow.
ME
Merlyn
2 years ago
D is also a good point. Losing all the data on the current screen? That's a recipe for frustration and user rage. NTO should definitely watch out for that.
NI
Nicolette
1 year ago
D is a good point. Losing all the data on the current screen can be frustrating.
ST
Stefania
1 year ago
A) Allow Navigation' needs to be set to TRUE on the Flow.
RE
Remedios
2 years ago
But what about option C? Duplicates could be a big issue too.
TE
Terrilyn
2 years ago
I agree with Janine, losing field values would be a hassle.
DO
Dorothy
2 years ago
I agree with C. Having users go back and forth could create a mess with duplicate requests. Gotta keep that flow tight!
JA
Janine
2 years ago
I think NTO should keep in mind option D.
KA
Katlyn
2 years ago
C is the correct answer. Letting users navigate back can lead to duplicates, which is a valid concern that NTO should keep in mind.
MA
Marget
1 year ago
True, it's important to balance user experience with data integrity in this case.
RY
Ryan
1 year ago
That's a good point. Maybe NTO should consider a way to save field values when users navigate back.
LA
Lanie
1 year ago
But what about D? If all field values are lost, that could be frustrating for users.
MA
Martina
2 years ago
I think C is the correct answer. We need to avoid duplicates.