Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Exam - Topic 5 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) exam

Question #: 114
Topic #: 5

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions]

A developer has a requirement to query three fields (Id, Name, Type) from an Account; and first and last names for all Contacts associated with the Account.

Which option is the preferred, optimized method to achieve this for the Account named 'Ozone Electronics'?

AOption A

BOption B

COption C

DOption D

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Francis at May 02, 2025, 03:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dylan

2 months ago

Not sure about Option C, seems a bit off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

2 months ago

I’m surprised they didn’t include a JOIN in any of these!

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

3 months ago

Definitely going with Option D, it’s the most efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

3 months ago

I think Option B is better, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

3 months ago

Option A looks solid for this query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

3 months ago

I’m pretty confident that we should avoid unnecessary fields in our query, but I’m not sure which option does that best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards Option B, but I can’t recall if it was the one that included all necessary fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

4 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to retrieve related records. I feel like using a subquery might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacey

4 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of optimizing queries, but I’m not sure which option is the most efficient here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

4 months ago

I feel pretty confident that Option B is the way to go here. The nested SOQL queries should give me all the information I need in the most optimized manner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosann

4 months ago

Option D looks like it might be the most efficient way to get the required data, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleni

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different options here. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each one to determine the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerilyn

5 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward query, but I'll need to carefully examine the options to make sure I'm selecting the most optimized approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

8 months ago

Hmm, Option B seems like the most efficient choice here. Gotta love those SOQL queries that just get the job done, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

8 months ago

I'm just gonna go with whatever makes the database cry the loudest. Chaos is my middle name!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquline

8 months ago

Option C, all the way. I mean, who needs joins or subqueries when you can just use the Force.com REST API? That's the future, my friend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nathalie

8 months ago

Option A is the way to go, man. That's the classic approach, and you can't beat the simplicity. Why overcomplicate things, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Rodrigo

8 months ago

Let's go with Option A then. It's the preferred method for querying those fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

8 months ago

Yeah, sometimes the classic approach is the best way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

8 months ago

I agree, Option A is simple and effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twila

8 months ago

Yeah, Option A is the classic approach and it's reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carisa

8 months ago

I agree, Option A is the most optimized method for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edgar

8 months ago

Option A is definitely the best choice. It's simple and gets the job done.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

9 months ago

I'm going with Option D. Gotta love that SOQL query, it's so clean and efficient. Plus, who doesn't love a good subquery?

upvoted 0 times

Teddy

7 months ago

User 3: Agreed, Option D with the subquery is the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

7 months ago

User 2: Option D is definitely the way to go. Subqueries are a game-changer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

8 months ago

User 1: I prefer Option D too. Subqueries make the query more efficient and clean.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

9 months ago

I personally prefer Option C because it uses a join to fetch the required data in a single query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

9 months ago

That's a valid point, but Option A might still be more optimized in terms of performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

9 months ago

Option B looks like the way to go. Why do all the extra joins when you can just grab the fields you need in one query?

upvoted 0 times

Theron

8 months ago

User1: Exactly, no need to complicate things with extra joins. Option B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

9 months ago

User2: I agree, Option B is more efficient. Just grab what you need in one query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louisa

9 months ago

User1: Option B is definitely the best choice. No need for unnecessary joins.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

10 months ago

I disagree, I believe Option B is better as it uses a subquery to retrieve the contact information efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

10 months ago

I think Option A is the preferred method because it uses a single query to retrieve all the required fields.

upvoted 0 times

...