Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Exam - Topic 5 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions]

A developer is developing a reusable Aura component that will reside on an sObject Lightning page with the following HTML snippet:

How can the component"5 controller get the context of the Lightning page that the sObject is on without requiring additional test coverage?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

By implementing force:hasSobjectName, the Aura component can retrieve the sObject context of the record page it is placed on without needing additional information. This interface provides the component with the API name of the sObject being displayed.


Aura Components Developer Guide

by Glory at Apr 09, 2025, 06:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Julene
4 months ago
D seems like a workaround, not a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
4 months ago
C sounds too complicated for just getting context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
5 months ago
I think B might be better for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
5 months ago
Wait, can you really avoid test coverage with A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
5 months ago
A is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
5 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this where we had to create design attributes, but I’m not confident if that’s the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
5 months ago
Setting the sObject type as a component attribute sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that would actually avoid needing additional test coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
6 months ago
I think the gerSubjectType method could be useful, but I feel like it might require more testing than just getting the context directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
6 months ago
I remember something about using force:hasSobjectName, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right way to get the context without extra test coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
6 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the key is to use a design attribute to configure the sObject type, as that seems the most straightforward and flexible approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on understanding the different ways to access the sObject context, and then evaluate which option best fits the requirement of not needing additional test coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the question. I'm not sure I fully understand the context of the sObject Lightning page and how that relates to the component's controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
11 months ago
Wait, so we're supposed to get the context of the Lightning page without writing any tests? Sounds like a job for the magical App Builder fairies. D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
11 months ago
A? Really? Adding force:hasSobjectName to the implements attribute? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. D is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
11 months ago
Hmm, B seems a bit too complicated. Why use an Apex class when we can just use the built-in Aura capabilities? I'd go with D.
upvoted 0 times
Alona
10 months ago
I think D is the easiest solution without overcomplicating things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
10 months ago
Yeah, D seems like the most straightforward option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
10 months ago
I agree, using the built-in Aura capabilities is much simpler. D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lakeesha
12 months ago
Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure if setting the sObject type as a component attribute is the best approach here. Seems like it might be a bit of a hack.
upvoted 0 times
Kizzy
10 months ago
A: Yeah, it could get messy. Option D seems like a cleaner way to handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
10 months ago
B: I agree, setting the sObject type as a component attribute might not be the most elegant solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
11 months ago
A: I think option D might be a better approach. Creating a design attribute and configuring it via App Builder seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
12 months ago
But wouldn't adding force:hasSobjectName provide the context of the Lightning page without needing additional test coverage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
12 months ago
I think the answer is D. Creating a design attribute and configuring it via the App Builder seems like the most straightforward way to get the context of the Lightning page without additional test coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Set the sObject type as a component attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Add force:hasSobjectName to the implements attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel