Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce OMS-435 Exam - Topic 9 Question 74 Discussion

A developer is configuring an integration Procedure Action in an OmniScript. The Omniscript needs a JSON response from the Integration Procedure but does not need to wait for the response for the user to proceed.Which feature should the developer enable?
D) Invoke Mode Non-Blocking
A) Toast Completion
B) Use Future
C) Invoke Mode Fire and Forget

Salesforce OMS-435 Exam - Topic 9 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's OMS-435 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 9
[All OMS-435 Questions]

A developer is configuring an integration Procedure Action in an OmniScript. The Omniscript needs a JSON response from the Integration Procedure but does not need to wait for the response for the user to proceed.

Which feature should the developer enable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jennie at Aug 12, 2025, 12:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OMS-435 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kenneth
6 months ago
I’m not sure about that, but it sounds right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
6 months ago
A Toast Completion? Seems unnecessary for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
6 months ago
I think D, Non-Blocking, could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
6 months ago
Wait, does Fire and Forget really mean we don’t wait at all?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
6 months ago
Definitely C, Fire and Forget is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
7 months ago
I feel like "Toast Completion" is more about user notifications rather than handling the integration response. I think it’s not the right choice for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
7 months ago
I recall that "Use Future" was mentioned in a practice question about asynchronous processes, but I'm not sure if it applies here since we need a JSON response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
7 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the differences between "Non-Blocking" and "Fire and Forget." They sound similar, but I can't remember which one is specifically for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
7 months ago
I think the "Fire and Forget" option is what we practiced for scenarios where we don't need a response immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
7 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is "Invoke Mode Fire and Forget". That option seems to match the requirement of not needing to wait for the response, and it's specifically mentioned in the question. The other options don't seem as relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The developer needs to enable a feature that allows the OmniScript to continue without waiting for the integration response. Based on that, I think the answer is "Invoke Mode Fire and Forget" or "Invoke Mode Non-Blocking". Those options sound like they would let the integration run in the background while the user can proceed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a JSON response, so I'm wondering if "Toast Completion" is the right option since that doesn't seem to involve a response. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about configuring an OmniScript integration. I think the key is to understand the requirement that the OmniScript doesn't need to wait for the response, so I'll focus on the options that allow the integration to run asynchronously.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel