Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce OMS-435 Exam - Topic 7 Question 31 Discussion

Posted by Cyndy on Aug 04, 2023 at 05:52 AM

A developer has an existing DataRaptor Load that insert Contact records with inputs as LastName and firstName. The DataRaptor works as expected when previewed.

The developer creates an integration Procedure to test the DataRaptor and is using a SetValues element in the Integration Procedure to set the first name and last name for the contact record. The DataRaptor and Integration Procedure are set up as shown in the exhibit below.

When the developer executes the Integration procedure in preview, the following error message displays: Required fields are missing: [last Name]'',

How should the developer address this issue?

Suggested Answer: A, D

Get Premium OMS-435 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
DA
Dahlia 11 months ago
Adding to Additional input seems like the right move!
DU
Dusti 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure the field names are correct?
MA
Mayra 12 months ago
I think the DataRaptor needs to run before the Set Values.
JA
Jacqueline 12 months ago
Definitely need to check those Action Keys!
RY
Ryan 12 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of missing inputs!
YO
Yoko 1 year ago
I think adding valid field names in the Domain object could help, but I’m not entirely confident that’s the main issue here.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
I feel like the order of execution could be important here, but I can't recall if the DataRaptor needs to run before the Set Values action.
SO
Sommer 1 year ago
This seems similar to a practice question where we had to ensure the field names matched exactly. I think option B might be the right choice.
BU
Buck 1 year ago
I remember something about needing to set the correct input fields in the DataRaptor, but I'm not sure if it's about the Additional input or the Action Keys.
RE
Refugia 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on the requirement, I think setting the INV_DEFAULT_WHSE_ID profile option at the role level is the way to go. That way, we can have different roles for the different warehouses and the users will automatically get the right default when they log in.
AU
Audria 1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about visualizing non-linearity in binary logistic regression. I think I'll go with option B - a trend plot of empirical logit versus a predictor variable. That seems like the most direct way to check for non-linearity.
AN
Annelle 1 year ago
I really think option A has a valid point about smooth transitions. But I'm not sure if the Elastic Network Capacity pattern was specifically covered in our materials.
VA
Valda 1 year ago
Okay, let me see. Coke drum shells are subjected to extreme temperature changes, so thermal fatigue makes the most sense to me. I'll go with that.
BE
Bea 1 year ago
The developer should really consider a career change to professional cat juggling. As for the question, I'd go with option C - it's the only one that doesn't involve some kind of sorcery.
LA
Lavina 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the developer needs to add some glitter and unicorn dust to the integration procedure to make it work properly. Option A seems the most whimsical choice.
DE
Denny 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lavina
Yes, that should help address the missing required fields error message.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lavina
I agree, adding SetValuesContactDetails to Additional input of DataRaptor Post Action makes sense.
TR
Trina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lavina
Option A seems like the most logical choice to me.
GR
Gretchen 1 year ago
This one's a real head-scratcher! Maybe the developer should try turning it off and on again. Or perhaps they need to consult a ouija board for the answer. Option B seems legit though.
LO
Lorrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gretchen
That should solve the issue with the missing required fields.
LI
Lillian 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gretchen
I agree, the Set values Action Keys should include the DataRaptor Post Action element name path.
FR
France 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gretchen
Option B seems like the correct choice.
SE
Serita 1 year ago
Hmm, the problem seems to be that the DataRaptor is expecting a 'last Name' field, but the Set Values action is using 'lastname' instead. Option D looks like the way to go.
MI
Mira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Serita
Yes, the developer should add the valid field names in the DataRaptor.
RO
Ronnie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Serita
I agree, the field names should match in the DataRaptor.
AN
Angella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Serita
I think option D is the correct solution.
AN
Annabelle 2 years ago
I think the issue is with the order of execution. The Set Values action should come before the DataRaptor Post Action, so option C is the correct answer.
RO
Rolland 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annabelle
C) The DataRaptor Post Action in the integration procedure should have been executed before the Set Values Action
ER
Erick 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annabelle
B) The Set values Action Keys should include the DataRaptor Post Action element name path, e,g LoadContactDetails, lastname
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annabelle
A) SetValuesContactDetails should have been added to Additional input of DataRaptor Post Action in Integration Procedure
LI
Lindy 2 years ago
I believe option C might also be a valid solution to address the issue.
MI
Mitsue 2 years ago
I agree with Han, option B seems like the correct solution.
HA
Han 2 years ago
I think the developer should choose option B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel