Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce OMS-435 Exam - Topic 6 Question 30 Discussion

Posted by Alline on Jul 27, 2023 at 11:43 AM

A developer needs to retrieve data from an external system that stores policy dat

a. The external system supports REST APIs to access and update the policies. Due to the volume of the policy data and peak hours of hours of business, calls to the REST APIs sometimes take longer than expected to response.

The developer creates an Integration Procedure to retrieve the policy data for use in an OmniScript.

Given the external system's knows performance issues, which configuration should be used to implement the call to the external system?

Choose 2 answers

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium OMS-435 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
SU
Sueann 11 months ago
120000 milliseconds? That's like 2 minutes, right? Wow!
GA
Galen 11 months ago
A and B make total sense, no doubt!
OL
Oliva 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about D? Seems unnecessary.
JA
Jamika 12 months ago
I think C is also important for better flow.
JU
Jules 12 months ago
Definitely A and B, timeout settings are crucial!
BA
Barrett 1 year ago
I recall that checking the Chain on Step Check in option D could help with managing the flow, but I'm not confident if it addresses the performance problem directly.
ZA
Zana 1 year ago
I feel like the Chainable checkbox in option C might not be directly related to the timeout issue, but I could be wrong.
LO
Lonny 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think configuring a Remote action with a specific timeout like in option B could help manage those delays too.
SU
Susana 1 year ago
I remember we discussed setting timeout properties in our last practice session. I think option A makes sense for handling slow responses.
KA
Katy 1 year ago
I've got this! Normalized, Manually Normalized, and Version Normalized are definitely on the list. The other three are probably Match Not Found, New, and Found.
TE
Teddy 1 year ago
I think we had an example where overhead was spread differently, which changed the profit margins a lot. I hope I remember the calculations right for this question.
QU
Quentin 1 year ago
Increasing the thickness of the roads? That doesn't seem relevant to the question at all. I'm going to rule that one out.
CE
Ceola 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know Tripwire and iptables are security tools, but I'm not sure if they're directly relevant to mitigating buffer overflow attacks. I'll have to review my notes on this topic.
DO
Dolores 1 year ago
This one seems straightforward - I think the answer is virtualization, which allows multiple operating systems to run on a single host.
GO
Golda 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The requirements are clear, and I know the Jira security options well. I'll select the two that best match what Beehive Bank is looking for.
CO
Colton 1 year ago
I'm just hoping the external system doesn't get stuck in an endless loop or something. Gotta be careful with those REST APIs, you know? Maybe we should all just buy a carrier pigeon and use that instead.
CA
Candida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colton
D: Agreed. We need to make sure we handle the external system's performance issues properly.
EL
Elli 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colton
C: Maybe we should also configure a Remote action with timeout settings of 120000, just to be safe.
BU
Bulah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colton
B: Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. We don't want the calls to the REST APIs taking too long.
MI
Micaela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colton
A: I think we should set the Timeout property on the HTTP Action in the Integration Procedure.
PH
Phillip 1 year ago
You got that right, Valentine. I almost fell for that one too. But I think the key here is to focus on the actual performance issues, not just the success of the call. A and B seem like the clear winners to me.
VA
Valentine 1 year ago
Haha, I almost went for option D, but then I realized that's more for checking if the step completed successfully, not necessarily dealing with the slow response times. These performance-related questions can be tricky!
MA
Maynard 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valentine
A: Definitely, it's important to consider the performance issues of the external system when making these configuration decisions.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valentine
B: Yeah, I agree. Option B could also be helpful, configuring a Remote action with timeout settings can be a good solution.
LO
Lorean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valentine
A: I think option A is the way to go, setting a Timeout property on the HTTP Action can help with the slow response times.
LY
Lyda 2 years ago
Interesting. I was thinking option C might be a good choice too, to make the call chainable. But I suppose that's more for handling the response within the OmniScript, not the performance of the external system itself.
LA
Lawrence 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyda
B) Configure a Remote action with timeout settings of 120000
LU
Lucina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyda
A) Set the Timeout property on the HTTP Action in the Integration Procedure
EL
Elmer 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyda
B) Configure a Remote action with timeout settings of 120000
CR
Crista 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyda
A) Set the Timeout property on the HTTP Action in the Integration Procedure
KA
Karima 2 years ago
I also think configuring a Remote action with timeout settings of 120000 could be a good option to consider.
AR
Arlene 2 years ago
Hmm, the key here is to handle the performance issues of the external system. I think options A and B are the way to go - setting the timeout property on the HTTP action and configuring a remote action with appropriate timeout settings.
JE
Jesusita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arlene
C) Check the Chainable checkbox on the integration procedure Action in the OmniScript
ME
Meghann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arlene
Yeah, those options seem like the best approach to deal with the performance issues.
KA
Kati 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arlene
B) Configure a Remote action with timeout settings of 120000
FR
Francine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arlene
A) Set the Timeout property on the HTTP Action in the Integration Procedure
MA
Matt 2 years ago
I agree with Kiera. Setting the Timeout property will help us manage the performance issues.
KI
Kiera 2 years ago
I think we should set the Timeout property on the HTTP Action to avoid long response times.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel