New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 7 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 7
[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) Questions]

What Mule application can have API policies applied by

Anypoint Platform to the endpoint exposed by that Mule application?

A) A Mule application that accepts requests over HTTP/1.x

B) A Mule application that accepts JSON requests over TCP but is NOT required to provide a response

C) A Mute application that accepts JSON requests over WebSocket

D) A Mule application that accepts gRPC requests over HTTP/2

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Correct Answer : Option A

*****************************************

>> Anypoint API Manager and API policies are applicable to all types of HTTP/1.x APIs.

>> They are not applicable to WebSocket APIs, HTTP/2 APIs and gRPC APIs


by Hannah at May 18, 2024, 09:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Daren
3 months ago
I’m not sure about Option B, seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
3 months ago
Wait, can gRPC really be managed like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
3 months ago
Nah, Option C is not valid for API policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
4 months ago
I think Option D could work too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
4 months ago
Option A is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about HTTP requests. Option A sounds familiar, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
4 months ago
I feel like we discussed WebSocket in class, but I can't recall if it supports API policies. Option C seems uncertain to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about gRPC and HTTP/2 being supported for API policies. Could it be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
I think API policies can be applied to applications that use HTTP, so maybe option A is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
5 months ago
Okay, I'm feeling pretty good about this. The key is to identify the Mule application that exposes an endpoint that can be managed by Anypoint Platform. Based on the details provided, Option A seems to be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
5 months ago
I think I've got this. Option A mentions a Mule application that accepts HTTP/1.x requests, which seems like the most likely candidate for having API policies applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the Mule application that can have API policies applied, so I'll need to focus on the details of the application types described in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the details of each option to determine which Mule application can have API policies applied by Anypoint Platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different request types mentioned in the options. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between HTTP/1.x, JSON over TCP, WebSocket, and gRPC over HTTP/2 before I can confidently select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky question on rate-limiting approaches used on the Alcatel-Lucent 7750 SR. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through what I know about this platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. There are a few different Cisco security solutions mentioned, and I'm not sure which one would be the best fit for this scenario. I might need to review the features and capabilities of each one to make a more informed decision. Any tips on how to approach this type of question?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards MPLS configuration mode as well, since the command is MPLS-specific. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure I'm not missing something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
5 months ago
I remember practicing with the OCR option in Blue Prism, but what if the text in the PDF is selectable? Should we still go with option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
2 years ago
You know, I'd love to give a serious answer, but I can't help but wonder if there's a Mule application out there that accepts requests over Semaphore. Now that would be a real head-scratcher!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
2 years ago
Option C, all the way! A Mute application that accepts JSON requests over WebSocket? Sounds like a real silent but deadly kind of deal. I dig it!
upvoted 0 times
Yoko
2 years ago
Silent but deadly, I like the sound of that too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
2 years ago
Yeah, a Mute application with JSON requests over WebSocket does sound intriguing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
2 years ago
Option C, all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelia
2 years ago
Hmm, Option B looks interesting. Accepting JSON requests over TCP and not having to provide a response? Sounds like a party waiting to happen. I'm in!
upvoted 0 times
Gene
2 years ago
Francoise: Definitely, it opens up a lot of possibilities for different types of interactions. Let's give it a try!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 years ago
I agree, it could definitely streamline the process. Plus, accepting JSON requests over TCP is pretty versatile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
2 years ago
Option B does sound intriguing. Not having to provide a response could make things simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonette
2 years ago
I'm gonna go with Option D on this one. I mean, who doesn't love a good ol' gRPC request over HTTP/2? It's like the cool kid of the API world.
upvoted 0 times
Tracey
2 years ago
I agree, gRPC requests are so efficient and fast. Option D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
2 years ago
Option D sounds like the way to go. gRPC over HTTP/2 is the future!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. It's like the cool kid of the API world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 years ago
Option D sounds like the way to go. gRPC requests over HTTP/2 are pretty cool.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaclyn
2 years ago
Option A seems like a pretty straightforward answer. I mean, who doesn't love a good old HTTP/1.x request, am I right? But then again, I could be totally off base here.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
2 years ago
B) Option B
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 years ago
A) Option A
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel