Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Platform Architect I Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Platform Architect I exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All MuleSoft Platform Architect I Questions]

A company wants to move its Mule API implementations into production as quickly as possible. To protect access to all Mule application data and metadata, the company requires that all Mule applications be deployed to the company's customer-hosted infrastructure within the corporate firewall. What combination of runtime plane and control plane options meets these project lifecycle goals?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Correct Answer :Create separate Anypoint VPCs for non-production and production environments, then configure connections to the backend systems in the corresponding customer-hosted environments.

*****************************************

>>Creating different Business Groups does NOT make any difference w.r.t accessing the non-prod and prod customer-hosted environments. Still they will be accessing from both Business Groups unless process network restrictions are put in place.

>>We need to modify or couple the Mule Application Implementations with the environment. In fact, we should never implements application coupled with environments by binding them in the properties. Only basic things like endpoint URL etc should be bundled in properties but not environment level access restrictions.

>>IP addresses on CloudHub are dynamic until unless a special static addresses are assigned. So it is not possible to setup firewall rules in customer-hosted infrastrcture. More over, even if static IP addresses are assigned, there could be 100s of applications running on cloudhub and setting up rules for all of them would be a hectic task, non-maintainable and definitely got a good practice.

>>Thebest practice recommendedby Mulesoft (In fact any cloud provider), is to have your Anypoint VPCs seperated for Prod and Non-Prod and perform the VPC peering or VPN tunneling for these Anypoint VPCs to respective Prod and Non-Prod customer-hosted environment networks.


Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Contribute your Thoughts:

Janey
1 months ago
Ha! Looks like the company is really prioritizing security over convenience. Option A is the way to go, but I hope they have a good IT team to handle all that manual provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
Danilo
11 days ago
B: Yeah, but it sounds like a lot of work for the IT team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
15 days ago
A) Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
16 days ago
A: Option A is definitely the most secure choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
1 months ago
Option D might be the way to go. The iPaaS solution could provide a more efficient and scalable deployment option while still keeping the data and metadata secure within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
12 days ago
That sounds like a solid plan. It's important to consider both efficiency and data security when moving Mule API implementations into production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
15 days ago
That sounds like a solid plan. It's important to prioritize security and efficiency when moving Mule API implementations into production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
17 days ago
I agree, having the customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane could be a good balance for quick deployment and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
30 days ago
I agree, having the customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane could offer a good balance of control and ease of deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
1 months ago
Option D might be the way to go. The iPaaS solution could provide a more efficient and scalable deployment option while still keeping the data and metadata secure within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 months ago
Option D might be the way to go. The iPaaS solution could provide a more efficient and scalable deployment option while still keeping the data and metadata secure within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roslyn
2 months ago
I'm not a fan of Option B. Hosting the runtime plane on MuleSoft's infrastructure could introduce security risks that the company wants to avoid.
upvoted 0 times
Mozell
2 days ago
I agree, Option B does seem risky in terms of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
15 days ago
C) Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 months ago
A) Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Enola
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach to meeting the company's requirements. Manually provisioning the infrastructure within the corporate firewall ensures full control and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
2 months ago
That's a good point, but having both planes hosted by the customer in option A provides more control over security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better as it allows for faster deployment with MuleSoft-hosted runtime plane.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
2 months ago
I think option A makes sense because both the runtime plane and control plane are hosted by the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel