New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) Questions]

A company wants to move its Mule API implementations into production as quickly as possible. To protect access to all Mule application data and metadata, the company requires that all Mule applications be deployed to the company's customer-hosted infrastructure within the corporate firewall. What combination of runtime plane and control plane options meets these project lifecycle goals?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Correct Answer :Create separate Anypoint VPCs for non-production and production environments, then configure connections to the backend systems in the corresponding customer-hosted environments.

*****************************************

>>Creating different Business Groups does NOT make any difference w.r.t accessing the non-prod and prod customer-hosted environments. Still they will be accessing from both Business Groups unless process network restrictions are put in place.

>>We need to modify or couple the Mule Application Implementations with the environment. In fact, we should never implements application coupled with environments by binding them in the properties. Only basic things like endpoint URL etc should be bundled in properties but not environment level access restrictions.

>>IP addresses on CloudHub are dynamic until unless a special static addresses are assigned. So it is not possible to setup firewall rules in customer-hosted infrastrcture. More over, even if static IP addresses are assigned, there could be 100s of applications running on cloudhub and setting up rules for all of them would be a hectic task, non-maintainable and definitely got a good practice.

>>Thebest practice recommendedby Mulesoft (In fact any cloud provider), is to have your Anypoint VPCs seperated for Prod and Non-Prod and perform the VPC peering or VPN tunneling for these Anypoint VPCs to respective Prod and Non-Prod customer-hosted environment networks.


Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elmer
2 months ago
D sounds risky, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 months ago
C is interesting, but can it really be secure enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
3 months ago
I disagree, B could work too if they trust MuleSoft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
3 months ago
Wait, they want to use a MuleSoft-hosted control plane? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
3 months ago
Option A seems like the safest bet for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
3 months ago
I recall discussing the importance of keeping everything on-premises for security. So, A seems like the safest choice, but I’m not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
4 months ago
I feel like C could work too, but I’m confused about the MuleSoft-hosted control plane part. Doesn’t that go against the firewall requirement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question where a customer-hosted control plane was crucial for security. Maybe B could be a contender?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
4 months ago
I think the answer might be A, since it mentions both runtime and control planes being customer-hosted, which aligns with the requirement to stay within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
4 months ago
I've got this! The answer is A - manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane. That way, the company maintains full control over the runtime and control planes, which aligns with their requirement to keep everything within their corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
4 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The company wants to deploy Mule applications to their own customer-hosted infrastructure within the corporate firewall. That rules out any MuleSoft-hosted options. So I'm thinking the answer is either A or D, since those involve a customer-hosted runtime plane.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. What exactly are the "runtime plane" and "control plane" options? I'll need to review those concepts before I can confidently answer this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is to identify the combination of runtime plane and control plane options that meets the project's requirements of quickly moving Mule API implementations into production while protecting access to all Mule application data and metadata within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I feel confident I can solve it. I'll carefully review the options and think through the implications of each approach. I'm pretty sure I can find the right solution to prevent the Guest wireless traffic from accessing the Production network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
9 months ago
Ha! Looks like the company is really prioritizing security over convenience. Option A is the way to go, but I hope they have a good IT team to handle all that manual provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
8 months ago
I'm not sure about having the control plane hosted by MuleSoft, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
8 months ago
D) iPaaS provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
Yeah, having full control over both planes is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
8 months ago
A) Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
8 months ago
I agree, but having the control plane hosted by MuleSoft might be risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
8 months ago
B) MuleSoft-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
8 months ago
That does seem like the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
8 months ago
C: Hopefully they have the resources to handle it efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
9 months ago
B: Yeah, but it sounds like a lot of work for the IT team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
9 months ago
A) Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
9 months ago
A: Option A is definitely the most secure choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
10 months ago
Option D might be the way to go. The iPaaS solution could provide a more efficient and scalable deployment option while still keeping the data and metadata secure within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
9 months ago
That sounds like a solid plan. It's important to consider both efficiency and data security when moving Mule API implementations into production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
9 months ago
That sounds like a solid plan. It's important to prioritize security and efficiency when moving Mule API implementations into production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
9 months ago
I agree, having the customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane could be a good balance for quick deployment and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
9 months ago
I agree, having the customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane could offer a good balance of control and ease of deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
10 months ago
Option D might be the way to go. The iPaaS solution could provide a more efficient and scalable deployment option while still keeping the data and metadata secure within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
10 months ago
Option D might be the way to go. The iPaaS solution could provide a more efficient and scalable deployment option while still keeping the data and metadata secure within the corporate firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roslyn
10 months ago
I'm not a fan of Option B. Hosting the runtime plane on MuleSoft's infrastructure could introduce security risks that the company wants to avoid.
upvoted 0 times
Alana
8 months ago
D) iPaaS provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
8 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem risky in terms of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
9 months ago
C) Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
9 months ago
A) Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Enola
10 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach to meeting the company's requirements. Manually provisioning the infrastructure within the corporate firewall ensures full control and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
10 months ago
That's a good point, but having both planes hosted by the customer in option A provides more control over security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better as it allows for faster deployment with MuleSoft-hosted runtime plane.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
11 months ago
I think option A makes sense because both the runtime plane and control plane are hosted by the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel