MENU
An organization is sizing an Anypoint VPC to extend their internal network to Cloudhub.
For this sizing calculation, the organization assumes 150 Mule applications will be deployed among three(3) production environments and will use Cloudhub's default zero-downtime feature. Each Mule application is expected to be configured with two(2) Cloudhub workers.This is expected to result in several Mule application deployments per hour.
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Integration Architect (Mule-Arch-202) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
SU
Sunshine
11 months ago
Zero-downtime is a game changer for deployments!
YO
Yolando
11 months ago
Wait, 2048 IPs? That seems like overkill!
MA
Marti
12 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, B might be enough.
PA
Pansy
12 months ago
Definitely going with A, they’ll need the space.
GE
Geoffrey
1 year ago
Looks like they need a lot of IPs for those 150 apps!
RE
Rebeca
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards 1024 IPs, but I’m worried that might not cover future growth. I wish I could remember the exact numbers from our last practice session.
SH
Shaniqua
1 year ago
I recall that each worker needs an IP, so with 150 apps and 2 workers each, that’s 300 IPs at least. Does that mean we should go for 512 or more?
CA
Carmela
1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to calculate IPs for multiple environments. I feel like 1024 might be enough, but I'm not completely confident.
FR
Francoise
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the number of IPs needed for the applications, but I'm not sure if 2048 is too many or just right for 150 apps.
GR
Graciela
1 year ago
This looks like a classic network sizing problem. I'll break it down step-by-step and make sure I understand the requirements before selecting an answer.
IR
Ira
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. With 150 Mule applications and 2 workers each, that's 300 workers total. I think the key is figuring out how many IP addresses we need to support that. Time to do some math!
VA
Valentin
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the "zero-downtime feature" and how that affects the sizing. I'll need to research that a bit more before I can confidently choose an answer.
JU
Juliann
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I'll start by calculating the total number of Mule applications and workers, then use that to determine the appropriate VPC size.
HA
Haley
1 year ago
I feel like Option C looks familiar, but I can't quite remember if it correctly uses the regex to remove everything except digits.
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. I know version differences can cause compatibility issues, but I'm not sure exactly how that would affect the post-functions. I'll need to review my notes on Jira workflow management.
NA
Nana
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question states that only PaaS solutions can be used, and the solution provided includes both App Service and Storage Accounts. From what I remember, Storage Accounts are actually an IaaS service, not PaaS. So I'm going to have to go with "No" on this one.
LO
Lonna
2 years ago
This is a tricky one. I'm tempted to go with A) 10.0.0.0/21 (2048 IPs) just to be safe, but C) 10.0.0.0/23 (512 IPs) might be enough if they're really tight on IP addresses. Hmm, decisions, decisions...
BU
Buddy
1 year ago
Yeah, it's always better to have extra IPs than to run out later on.
GL
Glen
1 year ago
I agree, it's better to have more IPs available just in case.
JA
Jani
1 year ago
I think A) 10.0.0.0/21 (2048 IPs) would be the best option for scalability.
CH
Cherry
2 years ago
Haha, 'several Mule application deployments per hour'? That's a lot of deployments! I hope their CI/CD pipeline is on point. Anyway, I'm going with B) 10.0.0.0/22 (1024 IPs). Seems like a good balance between IP address space and efficiency.
JA
Janna
1 year ago
User 4: Let's hope their CI/CD pipeline can handle it!
FR
Francisca
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, it strikes a good balance.
DA
Davida
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, B) 10.0.0.0/22 does seem like a good choice.
VI
Virgie
2 years ago
User 1: Yeah, that's a crazy amount of deployments!
WI
Willard
2 years ago
But with 150 Mule applications and multiple deployments per hour, we need more IPs to avoid any potential bottlenecks
GL
Glory
2 years ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions 'several Mule application deployments per hour', so I'm leaning towards a larger IP address space like A) or B). But I could be wrong, so I'll have to think about it some more.
AZ
Azalee
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think option A) provides a more comfortable buffer for scalability.
RE
Rebbecca
1 year ago
I'm not so sure, I think option B) 10.0.0.0/22(1024 IPs) might be sufficient as well.
RO
Rodolfo
1 year ago
I agree, option A) seems like the best choice to ensure we have enough IP addresses for our needs.
LO
Louvenia
2 years ago
I agree, option A) seems like the best choice considering the number of applications and deployments.
DE
Devorah
2 years ago
I think we should go with option A) 10.0.0.0/21(2048 IPs) to accommodate the multiple Mule application deployments per hour.
ES
Essie
2 years ago
I think we should go with option A) 10.0.0.0/21(2048 IPs) to accommodate the multiple Mule application deployments per hour.
QU
Quinn
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option B) 10.0.0.0/22(1024 IPs) is sufficient for their needs
JA
Jamal
2 years ago
The question mentions that the organization is sizing an Anypoint VPC to extend their internal network to Cloudhub, so I think the answer should be A) 10.0.0.0/21 (2048 IPs). This provides the largest IP address space, which seems necessary to accommodate 150 Mule applications across three production environments.
WI
Willard
2 years ago
I think the organization should go with option A) 10.0.0.0/21(2048 IPs)