Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Integration Architect I Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 5
[All MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

An organization is sizing an Anypoint VPC to extend their internal network to Cloudhub.

For this sizing calculation, the organization assumes 150 Mule applications will be deployed among three(3) production environments and will use Cloudhub's default zero-downtime feature. Each Mule application is expected to be configured with two(2) Cloudhub workers.This is expected to result in several Mule application deployments per hour.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lonna
2 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm tempted to go with A) 10.0.0.0/21 (2048 IPs) just to be safe, but C) 10.0.0.0/23 (512 IPs) might be enough if they're really tight on IP addresses. Hmm, decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
Buddy
6 days ago
Yeah, it's always better to have extra IPs than to run out later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
13 days ago
I agree, it's better to have more IPs available just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
29 days ago
I think A) 10.0.0.0/21 (2048 IPs) would be the best option for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
2 months ago
Haha, 'several Mule application deployments per hour'? That's a lot of deployments! I hope their CI/CD pipeline is on point. Anyway, I'm going with B) 10.0.0.0/22 (1024 IPs). Seems like a good balance between IP address space and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
Janna
27 days ago
User 4: Let's hope their CI/CD pipeline can handle it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
30 days ago
User 3: Definitely, it strikes a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, B) 10.0.0.0/22 does seem like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
2 months ago
User 1: Yeah, that's a crazy amount of deployments!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
2 months ago
But with 150 Mule applications and multiple deployments per hour, we need more IPs to avoid any potential bottlenecks
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions 'several Mule application deployments per hour', so I'm leaning towards a larger IP address space like A) or B). But I could be wrong, so I'll have to think about it some more.
upvoted 0 times
Azalee
25 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option A) provides a more comfortable buffer for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
29 days ago
I'm not so sure, I think option B) 10.0.0.0/22(1024 IPs) might be sufficient as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 months ago
I agree, option A) seems like the best choice to ensure we have enough IP addresses for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 months ago
I agree, option A) seems like the best choice considering the number of applications and deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
I think we should go with option A) 10.0.0.0/21(2048 IPs) to accommodate the multiple Mule application deployments per hour.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
2 months ago
I think we should go with option A) 10.0.0.0/21(2048 IPs) to accommodate the multiple Mule application deployments per hour.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quinn
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B) 10.0.0.0/22(1024 IPs) is sufficient for their needs
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
The question mentions that the organization is sizing an Anypoint VPC to extend their internal network to Cloudhub, so I think the answer should be A) 10.0.0.0/21 (2048 IPs). This provides the largest IP address space, which seems necessary to accommodate 150 Mule applications across three production environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 months ago
I think the organization should go with option A) 10.0.0.0/21(2048 IPs)
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel