New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce MKT-101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MKT-101 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 4
[All MKT-101 Questions]

When building an email audience, a marketer first runs a query to update a data extension referenced in the audience query.

Which configuration should be used to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Hildred at Sep 14, 2024, 12:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MKT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerry
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, it’s all about the sequence!
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
3 months ago
Wait, can you really just place them in order? Sounds too easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
3 months ago
A is unnecessary; just order them correctly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
I think C makes more sense, but I see the logic in B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
4 months ago
B is the way to go! Audience query needs to follow exclusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the order of operations here; I thought the wait step was crucial, but now I’m not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, but I wonder if there's a chance that option C could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like the wait step could be important to ensure everything updates correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
5 months ago
I think placing the audience SQL Query Activity after the exclusion SQL Query Activity makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The answer has to be option B, placing the audience query after the exclusion query. That's the only way to guarantee the exclusion data is current when the audience is built.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not 100% sure, but I think option A with the wait step might be the safest approach to make sure the exclusion is fully updated before the audience query runs. Better safe than sorry!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
Okay, I've got an idea. If the exclusion data needs to be updated before the audience query, then option B seems like the way to go - placing the audience query after the exclusion query. That should ensure the data is current.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Is the "exclusion" referring to a specific data extension or segment that needs to be updated first? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the order of execution in a marketing automation workflow. I think the key is to ensure the exclusion data is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
5 months ago
I recall a practice question about service-oriented design, and I'm pretty sure it highlighted the role of service candidates as inputs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 year ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option B provides a clearer sequence of steps in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it directly places the audience SQL Query Activity below the exclusion SQL Query Activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice because it ensures the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
1 year ago
You know, I was gonna say A), but then I realized that's like trying to microwave a burrito while it's still in the wrapper. Just doesn't make any sense, does it? B) is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Silva
1 year ago
Definitely, B) is the way to go for updating the exclusion before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 year ago
Yeah, B) makes more sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
1 year ago
I agree, A) just doesn't seem practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgina
1 year ago
Oooh, A) with the wait step? Sounds like a recipe for a good old-fashioned time loop to me! Let's keep it moving, folks. B) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm gonna have to go with B) on this one. Keeps things nice and simple, no unnecessary waiting around. Efficiency, that's the name of the game!
upvoted 0 times
Tamesha
1 year ago
B) is the best option, keeps things simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
Definitely, efficiency is key. B) all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
I agree, B) is the way to go. No need to wait around.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I was thinking C) at first, but then I realized that's basically the same thing as B), just with more steps. Why overcomplicate it, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 year ago
B) is the way to go. Gotta make sure that exclusion data gets updated before the audience query runs. Anything else just seems like asking for trouble, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Craig
1 year ago
C) Place the audience SQL Query Activity below the exclusion SQL Query Activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
1 year ago
B) Place the audience SQL Query Activity in a step after the exclusion SQL Query Activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
A) In the step with the two SQL activities, place a wait step between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel