Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce MKT-101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 34 Discussion

Northern Trail Outfitters injects customers into journey B based upon email engagement in journey A.Which method would facilitate this solution?
B) In Automation Studio, query activity engagement on Journey System data view for email send to journey A; Use result data extension for journey B Subjects.
A) In journey A, engagement split afteremail send. In Automation studio, query JourneyActivity data new for the Engagement split result Boolean field, Use result Data
C) In Automation Studio, use verification activity to verify engagement on email in journey A' Query engagement data extension for journey B Subjects.
D) In journey A engagement split followed by Contact Activity to Boolean on an engagement data extension; Query engagement data extension injections.

Salesforce MKT-101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MKT-101 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 1
[All MKT-101 Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters injects customers into journey B based upon email engagement in journey A.

Which method would facilitate this solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Hubert at Oct 16, 2023, 07:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MKT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Simona
8 months ago
B seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
8 months ago
Wait, can we really inject based on email engagement like that? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
8 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. What about option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
8 months ago
Totally agree, A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
9 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
9 months ago
Option D seems like it could work, especially with the Contact Activity, but I’m not clear on how the Boolean field would affect the data extension for journey B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the verification activity in option C. I don't recall how that ties into the engagement split we learned about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
9 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to use Automation Studio to track engagement, so option B might be the one we need here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
9 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if the query for JourneyActivity data is the right approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
9 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think option A is the most direct approach, using the engagement split result directly to drive the journey B injections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
10 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'd go with option B - querying the journey activity data for the email send in journey A, and then using that data to populate the subjects for journey B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Is the "engagement split" referring to the email send in journey A, or something else? I want to make sure I understand the flow before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think through the process step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Option D looks like the way to go - using the engagement split and contact activity to create a Boolean flag, then querying that data extension for the journey B injections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
10 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The references were good, and I don't think we should put too much stock in unsubstantiated gossip. As long as the work they've done for other clients is solid, I say we move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
10 months ago
This seems straightforward - the item must be set up as taxable in the item master record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 year ago
Is there an option for 'Use a magic 8-ball to determine the right answer'? That's how I usually solve these kinds of problems.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
1 year ago
I agree, data-driven decisions are more effective in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
1 year ago
Perhaps using customer data analytics would be a better approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 year ago
Magic 8-ball is not a reliable method for business decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julieta
1 year ago
I'm just going to choose 'All of the Above' and hope the grader has a sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
Sage
1 year ago
Yeah, it's probably best to choose the most relevant option
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
1 year ago
I think that might be a risky strategy
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
All of the Above
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
1 year ago
Option A is the way to go, hands down. It's the only one that mentions the 'Engagement split result Boolean field', which seems like the key to this whole thing.
upvoted 0 times
Tess
1 year ago
User 4: Let's go with option A then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
1 year ago
User 3: That field seems important for this solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, it mentions the 'Engagement split result Boolean field'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
1 year ago
Option C is the way to go! Using a verification activity to confirm the engagement and then querying the data extension is a nice clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
Daniela
1 year ago
I agree, using a verification activity before querying the data extension is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. It's a clean and efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient method to inject customers into journey B based on email engagement in journey A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
1 year ago
Option C is the way to go! Using a verification activity to confirm the engagement and then querying the data extension is a nice clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martin
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Using the engagement split and then a Contact Activity to get the Boolean value for the engagement data extension seems like a more robust solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a potential solution with Contact Activity to Boolean on an engagement data extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C as it mentions using verification activity to verify engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
Option B looks good to me. Querying the Journey System data view for the email send in Journey A and using that data for Journey B seems like a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Lamar
1 year ago
User 4: Definitely, using the data from Journey A for Journey B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 year ago
User 3: That sounds like a simple and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, querying the Journey System data view for email send in Journey A seems like the right way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 year ago
User 1: Option B looks good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
1 year ago
I think the answer is A because it mentions using the Engagement split result Boolean field.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel