New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce MKT-101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MKT-101 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 1
[All MKT-101 Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters injects customers into journey B based upon email engagement in journey A.

Which method would facilitate this solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Hubert at Oct 16, 2023, 07:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MKT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Simona
3 months ago
B seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
3 months ago
Wait, can we really inject based on email engagement like that? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
3 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. What about option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
4 months ago
Totally agree, A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
4 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
4 months ago
Option D seems like it could work, especially with the Contact Activity, but I’m not clear on how the Boolean field would affect the data extension for journey B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the verification activity in option C. I don't recall how that ties into the engagement split we learned about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to use Automation Studio to track engagement, so option B might be the one we need here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if the query for JourneyActivity data is the right approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think option A is the most direct approach, using the engagement split result directly to drive the journey B injections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'd go with option B - querying the journey activity data for the email send in journey A, and then using that data to populate the subjects for journey B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Is the "engagement split" referring to the email send in journey A, or something else? I want to make sure I understand the flow before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think through the process step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Option D looks like the way to go - using the engagement split and contact activity to create a Boolean flag, then querying that data extension for the journey B injections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The references were good, and I don't think we should put too much stock in unsubstantiated gossip. As long as the work they've done for other clients is solid, I say we move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
5 months ago
This seems straightforward - the item must be set up as taxable in the item master record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
10 months ago
Is there an option for 'Use a magic 8-ball to determine the right answer'? That's how I usually solve these kinds of problems.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
9 months ago
I agree, data-driven decisions are more effective in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
9 months ago
Perhaps using customer data analytics would be a better approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
9 months ago
Magic 8-ball is not a reliable method for business decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julieta
10 months ago
I'm just going to choose 'All of the Above' and hope the grader has a sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
Sage
9 months ago
Yeah, it's probably best to choose the most relevant option
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
9 months ago
I think that might be a risky strategy
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
9 months ago
All of the Above
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
10 months ago
Option A is the way to go, hands down. It's the only one that mentions the 'Engagement split result Boolean field', which seems like the key to this whole thing.
upvoted 0 times
Tess
8 months ago
User 4: Let's go with option A then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
9 months ago
User 3: That field seems important for this solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, it mentions the 'Engagement split result Boolean field'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
9 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
10 months ago
Option C is the way to go! Using a verification activity to confirm the engagement and then querying the data extension is a nice clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
Daniela
9 months ago
I agree, using a verification activity before querying the data extension is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
9 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. It's a clean and efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
9 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient method to inject customers into journey B based on email engagement in journey A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
9 months ago
Option C is the way to go! Using a verification activity to confirm the engagement and then querying the data extension is a nice clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martin
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Using the engagement split and then a Contact Activity to get the Boolean value for the engagement data extension seems like a more robust solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a potential solution with Contact Activity to Boolean on an engagement data extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C as it mentions using verification activity to verify engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
11 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Querying the Journey System data view for the email send in Journey A and using that data for Journey B seems like a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Lamar
9 months ago
User 4: Definitely, using the data from Journey A for Journey B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
9 months ago
User 3: That sounds like a simple and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, querying the Journey System data view for email send in Journey A seems like the right way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
10 months ago
User 1: Option B looks good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
11 months ago
I think the answer is A because it mentions using the Engagement split result Boolean field.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel