Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Exam - Topic 9 Question 51 Discussion

An implementation engineer is requested to integrate the following files:File A:File B:The client would like to link the two files in order to view the two KPIS (Tasks Completed' and 'tasks Assignmed') alongside'Employee Name' and/or 'Squard'.A Parent-Child configuration was set between the two.Which two statements are correct?
C) The join can be successful even if 'empjd' isn't mapped and employee.name' is mapped to the same entity name in both data streams and D) Any one of the files can potentially be set as the Parent data stream
A) The two files cannot be Joined as they hold different measurements
B) The two files cannot be joined as they hold different dates
E) The two files were uploaded to a different Generic type

Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Exam - Topic 9 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 9
[All Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Questions]

An implementation engineer is requested to integrate the following files:

File A:

File B:

The client would like to link the two files in order to view the two KPIS (Tasks Completed' and 'tasks Assignmed') alongside'Employee Name' and/or 'Squard'.

A Parent-Child configuration was set between the two.

Which two statements are correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

In Marketing Cloud Intelligence, joining two files requires a common field to be mapped as the same entity. If 'employee_name' is consistently mapped across both data streams, it can serve as the basis for the join, regardless of whether 'employee_id' is mapped. The choice of which file serves as the Parent stream depends on the use case and the desired reporting structure, but technically, either could serve as the Parent.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Stephaine
3 days ago
D is interesting. Parent can be flexible, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
8 days ago
C makes sense. Mapping 'employee.name' is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
13 days ago
I agree, but B seems valid. Different dates could be an issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
18 days ago
I think A is wrong. Different measurements shouldn't matter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
23 days ago
This question is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
29 days ago
B) seems off, I doubt that's a valid reason to not join.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
1 month ago
Wait, can they really join if the dates are different?
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
1 month ago
C) sounds right, mapping can be flexible like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 month ago
I think D) is true, either file can be the parent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 months ago
A) is definitely wrong, they can join on different measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
2 months ago
I vaguely remember that either file can be the parent, but I’m not confident about the implications of that choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
2 months ago
I feel like the date difference could be a reason for a failed join, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
2 months ago
I think I practiced a question where the parent-child relationship was important, but I can't recall if it matters if 'empid' isn't mapped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I remember something about how different measurements can affect joins, but I'm not sure if that's the case here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel