MENU
Your client is interested in ingested the below file to a new generic data stream type:
The field 'Meeting Code' was mapped to the main entity key. 'How should the 'Room Number' be mapped?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
48 comments · newest first
TI
Tish
11 months ago
'Room Number' can be mapped as a separate entity key too.
JO
Joanna
11 months ago
Not sure about that, option D seems more logical to me.
NO
Noble
12 months ago
Wait, why would we use a custom metric for 'Room Number'?
TE
Tequila
12 months ago
Definitely agree with option A! Makes the most sense.
FR
Franklyn
1 year ago
I think 'Room Number' should be an attribute of 'Meeting Code'.
TY
Tyisha
1 year ago
I was leaning towards making it a custom metric with aggregation set to SUM, but I’m not confident that’s the right approach for this scenario.
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
I feel like mapping 'Room Number' as a separate entity key might make sense, but I can't recall if that complicates the data structure too much.
VI
Virgina
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we had to decide between attributes and metrics. I wonder if 'Room Number' should be treated similarly here.
JO
Johna
1 year ago
I think 'Room Number' could be mapped as an attribute of 'Meeting Code', but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option.
XU
Xuan
1 year ago
I think the best option is to treat 'Room Number' as a separate entity key. That way it can be mapped independently and still be associated with the 'Meeting Code' data.
KA
Kasandra
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. If 'Room Number' is an attribute of 'Meeting Code', that makes sense. But I'm not sure if a custom metric is the right approach here.
HA
Harrison
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different options here. I'll need to think through how each of these mapping approaches would work with the 'Meeting Code' as the main entity key.
NA
Nada
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward data mapping question. I think the key is to understand how the 'Meeting Code' field is being used as the main entity key.
MA
Marjory
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the most authoritative accounting pronouncement is the FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts. I remember learning about the FASB's hierarchy of standards in class.
CE
Celestina
1 year ago
I think this is a Lightning record page question. The key is that the admin wants the different elements to appear on separate tabs, which is a common use case for Lightning record pages.
BI
Billy
1 year ago
There was a similar question in a past paper about exemptions for (i), (ii), (iii); I’m trying to remember the notes.
MY
Myra
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Geoff wants to ensure consistent security settings, so he needs a way to manage and control the devices, not just monitor them. That rules out IDS and SIEM. VPN could help, but it's more about secure remote access, not device management. I think the best option here is C - MDM.
FE
Felicidad
2 years ago
B or C? Both make 'Room Number' quantifiable. I’m torn between them.
RA
Rasheeda
2 years ago
C) A custom metric and set aggregation to SUM. Wow, that's a bold choice. Are you trying to create a data black hole or something?
VI
Vi
2 years ago
C) A custom metric and set aggregation to SUM. Wow, that's a bold choice. Are you trying to create a data black hole or something?
CL
Claudio
2 years ago
B) A custom metric and set aggregation to AUTO
TH
Thomasena
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'
IZ
Izetta
2 years ago
That makes sense, but could it be a custom metric? Maybe B?
LI
Lindy
2 years ago
D) A separate entity key. Yep, that's the way to go. Anything else would be like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
TE
Teri
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'. Classic. Keep it simple, people!
MO
Monroe
2 years ago
C) A custom metric and set aggregation to SUM
SK
Skye
2 years ago
B) A custom metric and set aggregation to AUTO
ES
Essie
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'. Classic. Keep it simple, people!
HO
Hoa
2 years ago
B) A custom metric and set aggregation to AUTO
DA
Daryl
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'. Classic. Keep it simple, people!
FR
Franchesca
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'. Classic. Keep it simple, people!
AR
Arlette
2 years ago
B) A custom metric and set aggregation to AUTO
NI
Nickie
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'. Classic. Keep it simple, people!
VI
Vilma
2 years ago
Because 'Room Number' seems like a specific detail related to each meeting.
FR
Francine
2 years ago
B) A custom metric and set aggregation to AUTO. Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Feels like it might complicate things unnecessarily.
SH
Shanice
2 years ago
'Room Number' as an attribute of 'Meeting Code'? Why A though?
RE
Reta
2 years ago
D) A separate entity key. Makes sense to me, keeping room number as a separate entity key from the meeting code.
CH
Chantell
2 years ago
C) A custom metric and set aggregation to SUM
CA
Caprice
2 years ago
B) A custom metric and set aggregation to AUTO
GL
Glen
2 years ago
D) A separate entity key. Makes sense to me, keeping room number as a separate entity key from the meeting code.
CH
Chandra
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'
RI
Ricarda
2 years ago
A) An attribute of 'Meeting Code'
AF
Afton
2 years ago
D) A separate entity key. Makes sense to me, keeping room number as a separate entity key from the meeting code.
VI
Vilma
3 years ago
Yeah, it’s confusing. I'm leaning towards A.
FE
Felicidad
3 years ago
I'm not sure about this question. Mapping 'Room Number' seems tricky.
FE
Felicia
3 years ago
I agree with Rosalind, mapping it as an attribute makes more sense.
MA
Marquetta
3 years ago
No, I believe it should be a separate entity key.
RO
Rosalind
3 years ago
I think the 'Room Number' should be mapped as an attribute of 'Meeting Code'.