Salesforce Exam Marketing Cloud Intelligence Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Intelligence exam

Question #: 18
Topic #: 3

[All Marketing Cloud Intelligence Questions]

Your client provided the following sources:

Source 1:

Source 2:

Source 3:

As can be seen, the Product values present in sources 2 and 3 are similar and can be linked with the first extraction from 'Media Buy Name' in source1

The end goal is to achieve a final view of Product Group alongside Clicks and Sign Ups, as described below:

Which two options will meet the client's requirement and enable the desired view?

ACustom Classification: 1
Source 1: Custom Classification key will be populated with the extraction of the Media Buy Name.
Source 2: 'Product' will be mapped to Custom Classification key and 'Product Group' to a Custom Classification level. Exam Timer
Source 3: 'Product will be mapped to Custom Classification key. Came

BOverarching Entities:
Source 1: custom classification key will be populated with the extraction of the Media Buy Name.
Source 2: 'Product' will be mapped to Product field and 'Product Group' to Product Name.
Source 3: 'Product' will be mapped to Product field.

CParent Child:
All sources will be uploaded to the same data stream type - Ads. The setup is the following:
Source 1: Media Buy Key ---- Media Buy Key, extracted product value --- Media Buy Attribute.
Source 2: Product --- Media Buy Key, Product Group ---- Media Buy Attribute.
Source 3: Product --- Media Buy Key.

DHarmonization Center:
Patterns from sources 1 and 3 generate harmonized dimension 'Product'. Data Classification rule, using source 2, is applied on top of the harmonized dimension

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Bette at Sep 13, 2024, 06:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Marketing Cloud Intelligence Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Eloisa

26 days ago

I bet the client is really going to love all these options - it's like a choose-your-own-adventure exam question! I'm just hoping I don't end up in the 'you died' ending.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

27 days ago

The harmonization center approach is interesting, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit for this scenario. Generating a harmonized 'Product' dimension and then applying a data classification rule on top of it might be overkill when the other options seem more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

28 days ago

The parent-child option seems a bit more complex, but it could be a good solution if we need to maintain the relationships between the different data sources. Uploading them all to the same data stream type and setting up the appropriate mappings could work well.

upvoted 0 times

Magnolia

2 days ago

I think the overarching entities option might be simpler and still meet the client's requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

6 days ago

I agree, the parent-child option does seem complex, but it could be worth it for maintaining relationships.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

1 months ago

I like the overarching entities approach as it allows us to map the 'Product' and 'Product Group' values from the different sources directly to the corresponding fields. This feels like a more intuitive way to achieve the final view.

upvoted 0 times

Dick

27 days ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlton

2 months ago

I'm not sure, option C also seems feasible as it involves uploading all sources to the same data stream type and setting up the necessary mappings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erasmo

2 months ago

The custom classification approach seems like the most straightforward option to meet the client's requirements. Mapping the 'Product' values from sources 2 and 3 to the custom classification key, and the 'Product Group' to a custom classification level, should give us the desired final view.

upvoted 0 times