Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Exam - Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion

A client Ingested the following We into Marketing Cloud Intelligence:The mapping of the above file can be seen below:Date --- DayMedia Buy Key --- Media Buy KeyCampaign Name --- Campaign NameCampaign Group -. Campaign Custom Attribute 01Clicks ---> ClicksMedia Cost ---> Media CostCampaign Planned Clicks ---> Delivery Custom Metric 01The client would like to have a "Campaign Planned Clicks" measurement.This measurement should return the "Campaign Planned Clicks" value per Campaign, for example:For Campaign Name 'Campaign AAA", the "Campaign Planned Clicks" should be 2000, rather than 6000 (the total sum by the number of Media Buy keys).In order to create this measurement, the client considered multiple approaches. Please review the different approaches and answer the following question:Which two options will yield a false result:
B) Option 5 and C) Option 3
A) Option 2
D) Option 4
E) Option 1

Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Exam - Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 2
[All Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Questions]

A client Ingested the following We into Marketing Cloud Intelligence:

The mapping of the above file can be seen below:

Date --- Day

Media Buy Key --- Media Buy Key

Campaign Name --- Campaign Name

Campaign Group -. Campaign Custom Attribute 01

Clicks ---> Clicks

Media Cost ---> Media Cost

Campaign Planned Clicks ---> Delivery Custom Metric 01

The client would like to have a "Campaign Planned Clicks" measurement.

This measurement should return the "Campaign Planned Clicks" value per Campaign, for example:

For Campaign Name 'Campaign AAA", the "Campaign Planned Clicks" should be 2000, rather than 6000 (the total sum by the number of Media Buy keys).

In order to create this measurement, the client considered multiple approaches. Please review the different approaches and answer the following question:

Which two options will yield a false result:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Alberta at Aug 02, 2024, 04:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hyman
9 months ago
Option 1 seems solid, but I’m not convinced about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
10 months ago
I think Option 3 could also be misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about Option 5? Seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
10 months ago
Totally agree, those options just don't add up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
10 months ago
Looks like Option 2 and Option 5 are the ones to avoid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
10 months ago
I remember we talked about how using the wrong aggregation method could skew the results. I think Option 4 could be problematic too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
11 months ago
I feel like Option 2 might be one of the false results, but I can't quite recall the reasoning behind it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
11 months ago
I think I saw a similar question in our practice set where we had to identify which options would miscalculate totals. I’m a bit unsure about Option 5 though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how aggregating metrics can lead to misleading results, especially if we don't account for unique identifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding how the data is structured and the intended outcome for the "Campaign Planned Clicks" metric. I think I can eliminate a couple of the options pretty quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
11 months ago
This is a good test of my ability to analyze data structures and think critically about different solutions. I'll need to be methodical in my approach to ensure I identify the right options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. I'll need to focus on understanding how the "Campaign Planned Clicks" value is calculated and which options might not properly capture that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different approaches outlined here. I'll need to think through each one step-by-step to understand how they work and which ones might not give the desired outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the data mapping and the different options to determine which ones will yield false results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option B is the correct answer. The `find` command with the `-type f` and `-name` flags should give us the count we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
11 months ago
I remember discussing the t-distribution, and I want to say it's 2.365 for a 95% confidence level. Just not 100% positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
Hah, Option 2 and Option 5? Seriously? Those options are about as useful as a chocolate teapot. The client wants the 'Campaign Planned Clicks' per Campaign, not the total. Gotta love it when the answers are so obvious, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Shaniqua
1 year ago
Let's focus on finding the correct approach to get the desired measurement for the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 year ago
It's frustrating when the answers are so obvious, but at least we can eliminate those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
1 year ago
The client clearly wants the 'Campaign Planned Clicks' per Campaign, not the total sum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I know right? Option 2 and Option 5 are definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawn
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm pretty sure Option 2 and Option 5 are the culprits. I mean, who would even think of summing up the 'Campaign Planned Clicks' by Media Buy Key? That's just not what the client wants. They want it per Campaign, simple as that.
upvoted 0 times
Shizue
1 year ago
Definitely, Option 2 and Option 5 don't make sense. The client specifically wants the 'Campaign Planned Clicks' value per Campaign, not by Media Buy Key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
1 year ago
I agree, Option 2 and Option 5 seem to be the incorrect choices. Summing up 'Campaign Planned Clicks' by Media Buy Key doesn't align with the client's request.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elly
1 year ago
I think Option 3 and Option 4 are the way to go. They seem to be the only ones that can calculate the 'Campaign Planned Clicks' per Campaign. I'm not sure why anyone would even consider Option 2 or Option 5, they're clearly not what the client is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
1 year ago
Option 2 and Option 5 will definitely give me a false result. The client wants the 'Campaign Planned Clicks' value per Campaign, not the total sum by the number of Media Buy keys. Those options don't seem to address that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think Option 1 might also be a potential false result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe Option 3 and Option 4 are the ones that will give a false result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
1 year ago
I think Option 2 and Option 5 will yield a false result.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel