Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Exam - Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Posted by Leonida on May 18, 2024 at 12:01 PM

An implementation engineer is requested to integrate the following files:

File A:

File B:

The client would like to link the two files in order to view the two KPIS (Tasks Completed' and 'tasks Assignmed') alongside'Employee Name' and/or 'Squard'.

A Parent-Child configuration was set between the two.

Which two statements are correct?

Suggested Answer: C, D

Get Premium Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional (AP-215) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
SE
Serina 11 months ago
Different generic types? That sounds odd, how does that even happen?
TA
Tamera 11 months ago
Parent-Child setup means one file can be the parent, right?
SH
Shaniqua 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Different measurements could be an issue.
EU
Eulah 11 months ago
I agree, as long as the key fields match, it should work!
PA
Patrick 12 months ago
The two files can be joined if the right fields are mapped.
MI
Mirta 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the Parent-Child setup. Can either file really be the Parent? I need to double-check that.
SH
Shawna 1 year ago
I feel like I read that as long as one key is mapped correctly, the join could still work. So maybe option C is correct?
EL
Elliot 1 year ago
I think I practiced a similar question where the date formats were a problem. It makes me wonder if that's relevant here too.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
I remember something about how different measurements can affect joins, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the case here.
ME
Melissia 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the parent-child configuration and how that impacts the join. I'll need to research that more to understand the implications.
EM
Emogene 1 year ago
The mapping of the entity names seems straightforward, so I'm feeling optimistic about getting the join to work successfully.
TR
Tresa 1 year ago
Ah, the date difference is an interesting wrinkle. I'll have to explore whether that's a blocker or if there's a way to work around it.
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
Hmm, the different measurements in the files could be a challenge. I'll need to think through how to properly join the data while accounting for that.
CH
Cherelle 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the file details and the parent-child configuration to determine the best approach.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
I've got a good strategy for this. Worms are designed to disrupt and interfere with normal computer operations, so if they take over the memory, that would likely prevent other programs from running. I'm going to go with True on this one.
BU
Bulah 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The Armada was the Spanish fleet that set sail in 1588 to invade England, so the correct answer is A, "complete".
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The key here is that the project manager is involving the service desk staff who don't like the planned improvements. That sounds like they're trying to address resistance to change, so I'm guessing the answer is D.
ER
Erick 1 year ago
I've seen rotating patterns used in various contexts, so I think I have a good handle on this. I'll select the two most likely answers and move on.
VI
Vicki 1 year ago
This seems straightforward - I think the answer is Product and Service.
IR
Irma 2 years ago
Wow, these files look like they were created by a toddler with a crayon. At least the question is straightforward, unlike the data!
EL
Ellsworth 2 years ago
↳ replying to Irma
D) Any one of the files can potentially be set as the Parent data stream
FA
Farrah 2 years ago
↳ replying to Irma
C) The join can be successful even if 'empjd' isn't mapped and 'employee.name' is mapped to the same entity name in both data streams
VE
Venita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Irma
A) The two files cannot be Joined as they hold different measurements
ME
Melvin 2 years ago
I'm going with A and B. These files seem like a total mess, no wonder the client is having issues.
JO
Josphine 2 years ago
D is the right answer. Any one of the files can potentially be set as the Parent data stream.
VI
Virgie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Josphine
That makes sense. It gives flexibility in how the files are linked.
LE
Lenita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Josphine
I agree, it doesn't matter which file is set as the parent.
AL
Almeta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Josphine
I think D is correct. Either file can be the parent data stream.
EL
Ellen 2 years ago
B is correct. The two files cannot be joined as they hold different dates. This is a common issue in data integration.
AL
Alise 2 years ago
I think the answer is C. The join can be successful even if 'empjd' isn't mapped and 'employee.name' is mapped to the same entity name in both data streams.
JU
Julieta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alise
Yes, I think so too. It makes sense that the join can still be successful in that scenario.
FE
Fernanda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alise
I agree with you, option C seems to be the correct one.
JE
Jerry 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alise
Yes, I think so too. It makes sense that the join can still be successful in that scenario.
RO
Rosalia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alise
I agree with you, option C seems to be the correct one.
SC
Scarlet 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alise
Yes, I think so too. It makes sense that the join can still be successful in that scenario.
MA
Marylin 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alise
I agree, option C seems to be the correct one.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel