Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Specialist (MC-202) Exam - Topic 3 Question 97 Discussion

When building an email audience, a marketer first runs a query to update a data extension referenced in the audience query.Which configuration should be used to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs?
B) Place the audience SQL Query Activity in a step after the exclusion SQL Query Activity.
A) In the step with the two SQL activities, place a wait step between them.
C) Place the audience SQL Query Activity below the exclusion SQL Query Activity.

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Specialist (MC-202) Exam - Topic 3 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Specialist (MC-202) exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Specialist (MC-202) Questions]

When building an email audience, a marketer first runs a query to update a data extension referenced in the audience query.

Which configuration should be used to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lonna at Sep 15, 2024, 12:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Specialist (MC-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Justine
9 months ago
Not sure about B, what if it slows down the process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
10 months ago
Wait, I thought it didn't matter which order you did these in?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
10 months ago
Definitely B! You want the exclusion to be updated first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
10 months ago
I think A could work too, but B seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
B is the way to go for proper sequencing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the audience query should definitely come after the exclusion query, which points to option B again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
11 months ago
I feel like placing the audience query below the exclusion query, like in option C, might be the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using a wait step. Could that be option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
11 months ago
I think we need to ensure the exclusion query runs first, so maybe option B makes sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
11 months ago
Option B seems like the safest bet. Separating the two queries and ordering them correctly should ensure the data is up-to-date when the audience is built.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
11 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to review the concepts around audience queries and exclusions to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
11 months ago
Option B looks like the best choice to me. By placing the audience query after the exclusion query, you guarantee the exclusion is updated first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between the options. I'll need to think through the order of the steps carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward configuration question. I think the key is ensuring the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different hierarchies and how they all fit together. I'll need to take some time to really understand the relationships between the PeopleSoft, SAP, and consolidated charts of accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 years ago
I'm gonna go with B) on this one. It's the most logical setup to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs. Anything else would be like trying to herd cats with a pool noodle.
upvoted 0 times
Marya
2 years ago
Definitely, it's all about setting up the right order for things to work smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 years ago
I agree, having the audience query run after the exclusion query is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
2 years ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to have the exclusion updated first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 years ago
I'm gonna go with B) on this one. It's the most logical setup to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melinda
2 years ago
A wait step? Really? That's like trying to microwave a penguin - it just doesn't make sense. B) is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
2 years ago
I agree, placing the audience SQL Query Activity after the exclusion SQL Query Activity makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
2 years ago
B) is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
2 years ago
A wait step? Really? That's like trying to microwave a penguin - it just doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
2 years ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option B provides a clearer sequence of steps in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it directly places the audience SQL Query Activity below the exclusion SQL Query Activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 years ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards C), but B) makes more sense. Gotta love these tricky email marketing questions!
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
2 years ago
Definitely, B) is the most logical configuration to ensure the exclusion is updated before running the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 years ago
I was also considering C), but now I see why B) is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. B) seems like the best option for updating the exclusion before the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
2 years ago
I think B) is the way to go. It just makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
2 years ago
I think option B is the best choice because it ensures the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
2 years ago
I think B) is the correct answer. The audience query should run after the exclusion query to ensure the updated data is used.
upvoted 0 times
Vi
2 years ago
Exactly, it's important to have the correct order for the queries to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
2 years ago
That makes sense. It ensures the updated data is used in the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
2 years ago
Yes, you're right. The audience query should run after the exclusion query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
2 years ago
I think B) is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel