New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Email Specialist (MC-202) Exam - Topic 3 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Email Specialist (MC-202) exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Email Specialist (MC-202) Questions]

When building an email audience, a marketer first runs a query to update a data extension referenced in the audience query.

Which configuration should be used to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lonna at Sep 15, 2024, 12:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Email Specialist (MC-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Justine
3 months ago
Not sure about B, what if it slows down the process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
3 months ago
Wait, I thought it didn't matter which order you did these in?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
3 months ago
Definitely B! You want the exclusion to be updated first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
4 months ago
I think A could work too, but B seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
4 months ago
B is the way to go for proper sequencing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the audience query should definitely come after the exclusion query, which points to option B again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
4 months ago
I feel like placing the audience query below the exclusion query, like in option C, might be the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using a wait step. Could that be option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
5 months ago
I think we need to ensure the exclusion query runs first, so maybe option B makes sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
5 months ago
Option B seems like the safest bet. Separating the two queries and ordering them correctly should ensure the data is up-to-date when the audience is built.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to review the concepts around audience queries and exclusions to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
5 months ago
Option B looks like the best choice to me. By placing the audience query after the exclusion query, you guarantee the exclusion is updated first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between the options. I'll need to think through the order of the steps carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward configuration question. I think the key is ensuring the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different hierarchies and how they all fit together. I'll need to take some time to really understand the relationships between the PeopleSoft, SAP, and consolidated charts of accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
I'm gonna go with B) on this one. It's the most logical setup to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs. Anything else would be like trying to herd cats with a pool noodle.
upvoted 0 times
Marya
1 year ago
Definitely, it's all about setting up the right order for things to work smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 year ago
I agree, having the audience query run after the exclusion query is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
1 year ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to have the exclusion updated first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 year ago
I'm gonna go with B) on this one. It's the most logical setup to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melinda
1 year ago
A wait step? Really? That's like trying to microwave a penguin - it just doesn't make sense. B) is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
1 year ago
I agree, placing the audience SQL Query Activity after the exclusion SQL Query Activity makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 year ago
B) is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
1 year ago
A wait step? Really? That's like trying to microwave a penguin - it just doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
1 year ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option B provides a clearer sequence of steps in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it directly places the audience SQL Query Activity below the exclusion SQL Query Activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards C), but B) makes more sense. Gotta love these tricky email marketing questions!
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
1 year ago
Definitely, B) is the most logical configuration to ensure the exclusion is updated before running the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
I was also considering C), but now I see why B) is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. B) seems like the best option for updating the exclusion before the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
1 year ago
I think B) is the way to go. It just makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice because it ensures the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
1 year ago
I think B) is the correct answer. The audience query should run after the exclusion query to ensure the updated data is used.
upvoted 0 times
Vi
1 year ago
Exactly, it's important to have the correct order for the queries to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
1 year ago
That makes sense. It ensures the updated data is used in the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 year ago
Yes, you're right. The audience query should run after the exclusion query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
1 year ago
I think B) is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel