New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Consultant (MCE-Con-201) Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Consultant (MCE-Con-201) exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Consultant (MCE-Con-201) Questions]

For security reasons, Northern Trail Outfitters indicates they cannot store PII directly within their Marketing Cloud account. They are considering implementing Tokenized Sending to pull PII from their data warehouse at send time. They indicate they send several large, time-sensitive emails per year.

Which two considerations should be made about Tokenized Sending? (Choose 2 answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leslie
4 months ago
Tokenized Sending is smart, but security is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
4 months ago
Wait, D? Field-level encryption too? That sounds intense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
4 months ago
C makes sense, outside servers complicate SLAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
4 months ago
I disagree, B is misleading. Personalization Strings shouldn't show PII.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
4 months ago
A is definitely a consideration, Journey Builder can help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
5 months ago
I believe combining Tokenized Sending with encryption is a good practice, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s mandatory or just recommended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
5 months ago
If I recall correctly, using outside servers can complicate SLAs, so that might be a critical point to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about how PII is handled in emails, and I feel like personalization strings might still expose some data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
5 months ago
I remember that Tokenized Sending is supposed to enhance security, but I'm not sure if it works well with Journey Builder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
5 months ago
The image shows a file with a list of package names, so I'm guessing it's a requirements.txt file. I'll double-check the options to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
5 months ago
This looks like a cryptography question. I think the key is to focus on the equation y^2 = x^3 + Ax + B, which is related to elliptic curve cryptography. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
5 months ago
Could it be binding the authentication policy directly to the virtual server? I feel like that was a step in a different scenario we practiced, but I could be mixing things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on corrosion resistance of different metals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
5 months ago
Ah, the old redirect issue. I've seen this before. I'll bet it's something simple, like a missing profile or an incorrect setting. Time to put on my troubleshooting hat.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel