MENU
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) Is building a Journey which randomly sends five different versions of an initial welcome email to new subscribers; however, subscribers receive the same follow-up email two weeks later. To improve maintainability of their email content, NTO wants to use five completely different emails, rather than having one email with dynamic content.
Which activity would allow them to build the journey with the fewest activities possible?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
BE
Beula
12 months ago
Einstein STO could also work, but not sure it’s the best fit.
TA
Tatum
12 months ago
Five different emails? That’s a lot! Are they sure that’s needed?
WA
Wai
12 months ago
Wait Until Date seems unnecessary for this scenario.
DA
Daryl
1 year ago
Definitely agree, it simplifies the process.
LE
Leslie
1 year ago
I think Engagement Split is the way to go for this!
AZ
Azzie
1 year ago
The Wait Until Date option seems like it would just delay the follow-up email, so I don't think that's what they're looking for in terms of reducing activities.
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
I feel like the Join activity might be relevant, but I can't recall exactly how it would fit into this scenario.
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
I think the Einstein STO could be useful for personalizing content, but it seems like it might add more complexity than needed for just sending different welcome emails.
CA
Camellia
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how using an Engagement Split can help with sending different emails based on subscriber behavior, but I'm not sure if it's the best option here.
NI
Nikita
1 year ago
The Universal forwarder seems like the most likely option, since it's the most widely used and feature-rich forwarder. I'll go with that for now, but I'll double-check the details in the exam prep materials just to be sure.
PA
Paulene
1 year ago
I think I've got it. The key is that the question is asking about a property that "only" takes effect on non-Windows servers, so that means the other options are likely properties that apply to both Windows and non-Windows servers. Time to eliminate the ones that don't fit that criteria.
WI
Willard
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around search uptime, downtime tolerance, and data volume.
ID
Idella
1 year ago
Partner Interconnect with a layer 3 partner seems like the way to go here. That way we can connect our on-premises network to the GCP VPC without needing to run BGP. I'm pretty confident this is the right answer.