MENU
A repeating engagement program is set to allow prospects to be eligible to re-enter every 90 days and has a total entries limit of 5.
A user decides that the total entries limit should be changed to 10. The user pauses the program, changes the total entries limit to 10 and restarts the program.
What will happen to the prospects who landed on the End step more than 90 days ago and previously reached the 5 total entries limit?
21 comments · newest first
AM
Amber
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this... seems a bit complicated.
TO
Tomoko
11 months ago
No way, they should be able to re-enter immediately!
HE
Herman
12 months ago
Wait, but if the limit is changed, does that affect their eligibility?
RI
Ricki
12 months ago
Totally agree, the 90-day rule still applies!
CA
Casey
1 year ago
I think they will have to wait another 90 days.
NI
Nida
1 year ago
I’m confused about this one. I thought if the limit was raised, they could just come back in immediately, which would be option B. But I’m not confident about that.
CH
Charolette
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where changing limits didn’t change the eligibility of existing entries. I think that might mean they won’t re-enter until manually approved, which is option D.
KE
Keshia
1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about how changing limits doesn’t affect those already in the program. Maybe they stay ineligible? That sounds like option C.
AR
Armando
1 year ago
I think the prospects who hit the 5 entry limit will have to wait another 90 days before they can re-enter, so I’m leaning towards option A.
JU
Juliann
1 year ago
This is a good example of a question that requires paying close attention to the details. I'll make sure to read it thoroughly before answering.
BU
Buck
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is laying out the specifics clearly, so I should be able to reason through the right answer.
TA
Tamra
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is understanding how the program's entry limit and eligibility rules work when the limit is changed.
ST
Stanton
1 year ago
This question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully consider the details about the program's eligibility and entry limits.
CO
Corazon
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about how the program's rules would apply in this scenario. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
JO
Jonelle
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by all these similar-sounding transaction numbers. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and try to eliminate the options that don't seem to fit.
BR
Brice
1 year ago
Okay, I've seen this type of question before. I think the key is to focus on the caching-related files, so I'll start by considering *caches.properties and tx-cache-configuration.xml.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on the pre-campaign analysis process.
AN
Annett
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this. I know accountability is a key principle, but I'm not confident which specific aspect they're asking about. I'll have to think this through carefully.
TU
Tuyet
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between tax groups and tax classification codes. I'll need to review those concepts to make sure I understand them properly.
TA
Tamar
1 year ago
I think we might have practiced something about capitalizing contract names, but I'm not sure if it's mixedCase or all caps for functions.
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the context correctly. The Sun One Directory Server is the LDAP database used to store the configuration for GVP, so the user name required should be one that has the necessary permissions to access and manage that configuration.