MENU
Universal Containers (UC) is rolling out its new Customer Identity and Access Management Solution built on top of its existing Salesforce instance. UC wants to allow customers to login using Facebook, Google, and other social sign-on providers.
How should this functionality be enabled for UC, assuming ail social sign-on providers support OpenID Connect?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Identity and Access Management Architect (Plat-Arch-203) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
RO
Rodolfo
11 months ago
Wait, can we really use all those social logins together?
ER
Ernest
11 months ago
D? Really? That sounds overly complicated.
MA
Maryrose
12 months ago
C is interesting, but not sure if JIT is necessary here.
SU
Susy
12 months ago
I think B is better for managing multiple providers.
TA
Tasia
1 year ago
Option A seems like the right approach.
DU
Dudley
1 year ago
I think option A sounds right since it mentions both authentication providers and registration handlers, which seems to cover all bases for social logins.
MI
Misty
1 year ago
I feel like the Just-In-Time handler is important for user provisioning, but I’m confused about whether we should use it with authentication providers or single sign-on settings.
MA
Mari
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about single sign-on settings, but I can't recall if they were necessary for each provider or just one overall.
AL
Alexia
1 year ago
I think we need to set up authentication providers for each social sign-on, but I'm not entirely sure if we also need registration handlers.
DI
Dick
1 year ago
Option D looks the most straightforward to me. A single sign-on setting and a JIT handler for each provider should give us the functionality we need without too much complexity.
MA
Mammie
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Configuring an authentication provider and a registration handler for each social sign-on provider seems like the most comprehensive approach to handle all the different providers.
SK
Skye
1 year ago
Okay, the key here is that all the social sign-on providers support OpenID Connect. That means we can likely use a standard approach rather than custom code.
MA
Maxima
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between authentication providers and single sign-on settings. I'll need to double-check the Salesforce documentation on those concepts.
LA
Latrice
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the Salesforce configuration requirements for social sign-on.
RO
Royce
1 year ago
That makes sense to me. The "Match All" condition means the users have to belong to all three of those categories.
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not totally confident in my understanding of the central limit theorem.
AR
Arlene
1 year ago
This is a good question that gets at an important decision point for an audit program. I think I'll start by considering the pros and cons of each option in terms of cost, consistency of training, and the level of expertise provided.
AL
Alica
2 years ago
Hey, at least they're not asking us to configure a social sign-on provider for Myspace. I'd go with Option B - a single sign-on setting and a registration handler per provider sounds like a solid approach.
MA
Maybelle
1 year ago
Definitely, it's a more efficient way to enable customers to login using different social sign-on providers.
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
Yeah, having a single sign-on setting and a registration handler for each social sign-on provider simplifies the process.
LA
Layla
1 year ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for UC's new Customer Identity and Access Management Solution.
JO
Josphine
2 years ago
Hold up, did you say 'Universal Containers'? Sounds like a container shipping company. I hope they're not trying to containerize my social logins! Anyway, I think Option D looks good.
MA
Matthew
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Using a JIT handler for each provider might provide more flexibility and control over the user registration process.
FA
Fabiola
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, using a JIT handler for each provider seems like the best approach for UC's new Customer Identity and Access Management Solution.
ST
Stefan
2 years ago
User 1: I think Option C is the way to go. It allows for more control over the user registration process.
AL
Alease
2 years ago
I see both points, but I personally prefer option C as it combines authentication provider with Just-In-Time handler for a more secure setup.
JE
Jeanice
2 years ago
Option A seems the most straightforward approach to enable social sign-on providers. Configuring an authentication provider and a registration handler for each provider makes sense to me.
DO
Dona
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go as it simplifies the process by using a single sign-on setting.
SA
Sabra
2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for more flexibility with different authentication providers.