Universal Containers utilizes two contractors, Contractor 1 and Contractor 2, to perform repair work Contractor 1 has provided service longer for UniversalContainers and is considered to have more repair work expertise than Contractor 2.
How should a Consultant configure this expertise for Contractor 1 versus Contractor 2?
Suggested Answer: A, C, E
Get Premium Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
OR
Orville
11 months ago
Different capacities? Not sure if that’s the best approach.
CE
Cecily
11 months ago
Totally agree, Contractor 1 should be the preferred resource!
LA
Lashawnda
11 months ago
Wait, can we really just exclude Contractor 2?
TH
Theron
11 months ago
I think assigning different skill levels makes sense.
KR
Kristel
12 months ago
Contractor 1 definitely has more expertise!
UL
Ulysses
12 months ago
I feel like assigning different capacities could work too, but I lean towards giving Contractor 1 the Preferred Resource status to reflect their expertise.
WA
Wade
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the Excluded Resource option. Wouldn’t that limit Contractor 2's ability to take on any work at all?
IV
Ivette
1 year ago
I think assigning different Skill Levels makes sense since Contractor 1 has more expertise. It’s similar to a practice question we did on resource allocation.
EL
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I remember discussing how to differentiate resources based on expertise, but I'm not sure if "Preferred Resource" is the right term here.
JU
Justa
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option D - assigning different capacities for the repair work. That way, we can account for Contractor 1's higher expertise without completely excluding Contractor 2.
CA
Carma
1 year ago
Okay, I've got an idea. Since Contractor 1 has more expertise, we should make them a preferred resource. That way, they'll get prioritized for the repair work. Option C looks like the way to go.
JO
Johnetta
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Should we exclude Contractor 2 entirely or just give them a lower skill level? Option A or B could work, but I'm not 100% sure.
CA
Cathrine
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to leverage Contractor 1's expertise, so I'd go with option B to assign different skill levels.
LO
Lorean
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding the behavior of OSPF and IS-IS in the given network topology, especially the role of the stub area and the NSSA. I'll carefully consider each option and eliminate the false statements.
JA
Jade
1 year ago
Comprehensive security sounds like something these routers should offer, so I guess D is also a benefit. Does that leave us with C?
TE
Tenesha
1 year ago
Hmm, I know MongoDB has some transaction support, but I'm not sure if it's the same as a relational database. I'll have to think about this one.
HY
Hyun
1 year ago
I feel like option A might be misleading since I don't remember them connecting to a local database for high availability.
AN
Andrew
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward configuration question. I think I can handle this one.
JU
Justine
1 year ago
Contractor 2 is so new, he probably thinks a 'skill level' is something you unlock in a video game.
ST
Stephane
1 year ago
I heard Contractor 1 is so experienced, he can fix a leaky faucet with just a paperclip and a packet of chewing gum.
SH
Sharan
1 year ago
A) Assign Contractor 2 as an Excluded Resource
LA
Lauran
1 year ago
C) Assign Contractor 1 as a Preferred Resource.
RA
Rasheeda
1 year ago
B) Assign Contractor 1 and 2 different Skill Levels for repair Work Type.
LA
Latosha
1 year ago
That sounds impressive! Contractor 1 must be really skilled.
KA
Kati
1 year ago
C) Assign Contractor 1 as a Preferred Resource.
AN
Antonette
1 year ago
B) Assign Contractor 1 and 2 different Skill Levels for repair Work Type.
FL
Florinda
1 year ago
I'm going with B. It's the most straightforward and transparent way to handle this scenario. Plus, it avoids any awkward 'preferred resource' situations.
CA
Callie
2 years ago
I'm torn between B and D. Assigning different capacities could work too, but I'm leaning more towards B since it directly addresses the expertise difference.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
True, but I still think assigning different skill levels would be more effective in utilizing their expertise.
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
But assigning different capacities for repair work could also be useful in managing workload.
LO
Louis
1 year ago
That makes sense, it would help ensure the more experienced contractor gets the appropriate tasks.
AL
Alaine
1 year ago
I think assigning different skill levels for repair work type is the way to go.
KA
Karl
2 years ago
C is also a good option, but I'm not sure if that would fully capture the nuance of their expertise levels. B seems like the most straightforward approach.
EL
Elfrieda
1 year ago
C) Assign Contractor 1 as a Preferred Resource.
RI
Rima
1 year ago
B) Assign Contractor 1 and 2 different Skill Levels for repair Work Type.
AL
Alison
2 years ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is B. Assigning different Skill Levels for the repair work type seems like the most logical way to capture the expertise difference between the two contractors.
AL
Alease
2 years ago
I think we should assign Contractor 1 and 2 different Skill Levels for repair Work Type. This way, we can utilize their expertise effectively.
JE
Jeanice
2 years ago
I agree with Nickole. Contractor 1 has more expertise, so it makes sense to prioritize them.
NI
Nickole
2 years ago
I think we should assign Contractor 1 as a Preferred Resource.