New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Exam - Topic 3 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Questions]

A client has data in a Heroku Postgres table. They want to generate analytics based on the table and make the results available in their Salesforce org. Their Salesforce administratorwants to minimize the amount of data that is written to Salesforce to accomplish this. Which strategy should an Architect recommend on this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elbert
3 months ago
Not sure if syncing is the best way, sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
3 months ago
Wait, can Heroku Connect really handle all that data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
3 months ago
Definitely agree with option D, it keeps things organized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
I think using the Bulk API might be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
4 months ago
Heroku Connect is a solid choice for syncing data!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D because it combines generating analytics in Heroku and syncing with Salesforce, but I’m not completely confident about the data volume implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think using the Bulk API might not be the best choice if they want to limit data transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
4 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; using Heroku External Objects could help keep the data in Heroku while still making it accessible in Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
I remember we discussed Heroku Connect in class, but I'm not sure if it's the best option here since the admin wants to minimize data written to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Writing the analytics results to a separate Heroku table and exposing that to Salesforce as external objects seems like a clean way to integrate the two systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
Option D seems like a good way to keep the data processing in Heroku and only sync the final analytics to Salesforce. That should help reduce the load on the Salesforce org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about integrating Heroku and Salesforce. I think option B looks like the best approach to minimize the data written to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the differences between the options. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach more carefully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question mentions "priority plan" and "lead time", so it could be related to either Material Requirements Planning or Master Production Schedule. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
9 months ago
Option E: Hire a team of trained pigeons to fly the analytics data to Salesforce. Minimal data transfer, maximum entertainment value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
9 months ago
Hmm, Option A might work, but then you're just duplicating data in Salesforce. Better to keep it all in Heroku if possible.
upvoted 0 times
Polly
8 months ago
Bettina: Yeah, that could be a good way to minimize the data written to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
8 months ago
User 3: Option D could also work, keeping the analytics in Heroku and syncing it to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
8 months ago
User 2: I agree, that way we're not duplicating data in Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
9 months ago
User 1: Option B sounds like a good idea. Keep the data in Heroku and just expose it to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salome
9 months ago
Oh man, Option C looks tempting, but using the Salesforce Bulk API to write all that data? Nah, I don't think that's the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
10 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with Option D. Syncing the analytics table to Salesforce using Heroku Connect seems like the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
Tamera
8 months ago
Syncing the analytics table to Salesforce using Heroku Connect does seem like a clean solution. Option D is a good recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
8 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the most straightforward approach to minimize data written to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
8 months ago
Option D sounds like the best choice. Syncing the analytics table to Salesforce with Heroku Connect is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
10 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. Minimizing data written to Salesforce is key, so leveraging Heroku External Objects is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Madonna
9 months ago
I agree, leveraging Heroku External Objects will definitely help in minimizing the amount of data written to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
9 months ago
Agreed, it's important to keep the data transfer efficient. Option B seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Using Heroku External Objects will help minimize the data written to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Van
11 months ago
I agree with Yvonne, option B seems like the most optimal solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient as it minimizes the data written to Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it syncs the data between Heroku Postgres and Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel