Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce FSL-201 Exam - Topic 5 Question 38 Discussion

Universal Containers outsources 100 hours of weekly maintenance to an external Contractor. Jobs are assigned to a Contractor Manager instead of individual external technicians. The Contractor Manager is in charge of updating Service Appointments and Work Orders upon completion.How should a Consultant implement the requirement?
B) Set the individual Technicians as Capacity-Based Service Resources. and D) Create the Contractor Manager as a Crew Service Resource.
A) Create the individual Technicians as Service Crew Members.
C) Set the Contractor Manager as a Capacity-Based Service Resource.

Salesforce FSL-201 Exam - Topic 5 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's FSL-201 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 5
[All FSL-201 Questions]

Universal Containers outsources 100 hours of weekly maintenance to an external Contractor. Jobs are assigned to a Contractor Manager instead of individual external technicians. The Contractor Manager is in charge of updating Service Appointments and Work Orders upon completion.

How should a Consultant implement the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

These are two actions that can help ensure that the technician who performed a customer's initial installation is also assigned to subsequent service calls. A preferred resource is a resource that has a preference or affinity for working with a specific account or service territory. A preferred resource service objective is a service objective that prioritizes resources that are preferred for an account or service territory. By adding the technician as a preferred resource on the account record, and adding the preferred resource service objective to the scheduling policy, the system can assign the technician to future service appointments for that account.


by Amie at Sep 02, 2023, 01:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FSL-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nobuko
8 months ago
Really? A Contractor Manager as a resource? Not sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
8 months ago
Totally agree with C, keeps it organized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
8 months ago
Wait, why not just assign individual technicians? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
9 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
9 months ago
Sounds like a solid plan to have a Contractor Manager handle it all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
9 months ago
I lean towards creating the Contractor Manager as a Crew Service Resource since it seems to fit the requirement of managing the workload effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
9 months ago
I feel like the Contractor Manager being a Capacity-Based Service Resource could work, but I can't recall if that aligns with how we handle updates on Service Appointments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
9 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to assign roles to technicians. Setting the individual Technicians as Capacity-Based Service Resources might be the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
9 months ago
I remember we discussed how to manage external resources, but I'm not sure if the Contractor Manager should be a Crew Service Resource or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between Capacity-Based Service Resources and Crew Service Resources. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to figure out how to represent the Contractor Manager in the system. I'm leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
10 months ago
Hmm, the question is a bit vague. I'm not sure if I should focus on the individual technicians or the Contractor Manager. I'll need to read it over a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
10 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the details carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
10 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The individual technicians should be set up as Capacity-Based Service Resources, and the Contractor Manager should be the Crew Service Resource. Option B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
10 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I know the difference between a data owner and a data custodian, so I'll give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to click on a cell in the "Inventory" table first, then look for the "Format as Table" option on the Home tab. That should let me select the Rose, Table Style Light 17 style.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
10 months ago
Namespaces are the solution here, I'm confident about that. They allow you to create separate environments within the same host, which is exactly what you need for Docker containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
1 year ago
Haha, outsourcing maintenance? Sounds like a recipe for disaster! But I digress, I'd say C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Elenore
1 year ago
Plus, it ensures that all the maintenance tasks are completed on time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
1 year ago
Definitely, it streamlines the process and keeps everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
1 year ago
Yeah, that way they can oversee the maintenance work efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
1 year ago
I agree, setting the Contractor Manager as a Capacity-Based Service Resource makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larue
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn between B and C. But I think C is the better option here. Gotta love these tricky maintenance questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 year ago
I'm gonna go with D. Creating the Contractor Manager as a Crew Service Resource seems like the right way to handle this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
1 year ago
I think the answer is C. Setting the Contractor Manager as a Capacity-Based Service Resource makes the most sense since they are the one managing the work and updating the Service Appointments and Work Orders.
upvoted 0 times
Sue
1 year ago
I think setting the individual Technicians as Capacity-Based Service Resources could also work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to create the Contractor Manager as a Crew Service Resource instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 year ago
That's a good point, creating the Contractor Manager as a Crew Service Resource could provide better organization and efficiency in completing the maintenance tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 year ago
I agree, setting the Contractor Manager as a Capacity-Based Service Resource would streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to create the Contractor Manager as a Crew Service Resource to have a dedicated team for the maintenance tasks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
1 year ago
I agree, setting the Contractor Manager as a Capacity-Based Service Resource would centralize the management of the work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isadora
1 year ago
That's a good point, option D does seem to align more closely with the requirement of assigning jobs to the Contractor Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more suitable as it specifically mentions creating the Contractor Manager as a Crew Service Resource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice because the Contractor Manager is in charge of assigning jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel