Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Field Service Consultant Topic 7 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Field Service Consultant exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 7
[All Field Service Consultant Questions]

The field service administrator at Ursa Major Solar updates the skills required on the most common work types to adapt to the increasing complexity of jobs. This change has led to many service appointments to be in violation. There is a global optimization job set up to run nightly that has been working correctly up until this point. The administrator needs to understand why the jobs are still scheduled to resources that lack the appropriate skill level.

What are two reasons appointments remain in violation and are not reassigned?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Products required and skill requirements are two fields that should be included when creating a work order to increase first-time fix rates. Products required are used to specify the products that are needed for the work order, and skill requirements are used to specify the level of expertise that is needed for the work order. By including these fields, the system can ensure that the technician has the right parts and skills to complete the work order.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lajuana
1 months ago
I'm going with B and D, just to mess with the administrator. Maybe they should try switching to a global optimization policy that actually works, or, you know, hire some qualified techs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think A and D are the answers. Global optimization can be a bit dumb sometimes, and if the skills just aren't there, well, you're kinda stuck, aren't you?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
1 months ago
Ah, the old 'territory not included' trick! C and D seem to be the way to go. Although, I bet the administrator is regretting those skill updates right about now.
upvoted 0 times
Melvin
7 days ago
C) The territory of the resources was not included in the global optimization request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
14 days ago
A) Global optimization doesn't reschedule appointments that have rule violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I'm going with B and D. The optimizer might be using a different scheduling policy than the dispatch console, and if the required skills aren't available, the jobs are just gonna stay in violation.
upvoted 0 times
Marg
14 days ago
That makes sense. The administrator will need to address both of those issues to fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
16 days ago
Yeah, and if there aren't enough resources with the skills needed, the appointments won't get reassigned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
23 days ago
I think you're right. The scheduling policy difference could be causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daron
2 months ago
Hmm, I think A and D are the most likely culprits here. The global optimization might not be smart enough to reschedule appointments with rule violations, and if there are no resources with the right skills, then what can it do?
upvoted 0 times
Corrinne
1 months ago
Yeah, and D is a problem too. If there are no service resources available with the required skill levels, then appointments will definitely remain in violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. If the global optimization doesn't reschedule appointments with rule violations, that could be a big issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
2 months ago
Maybe the reason appointments are not reassigned is because there are no service resources available with the required skill levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
2 months ago
I agree with Vince. The optimizer might be using a different scheduling policy than what is used on the dispatch console.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
2 months ago
I think the appointments remain in violation because the global optimization doesn't reschedule appointments with rule violations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel