New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Education Cloud Consultant (ED-Con-101) Exam - Topic 9 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Education Cloud Consultant (ED-Con-101) exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 9
[All Salesforce Certified Education Cloud Consultant (ED-Con-101) Questions]

Staff in Continuing and Professional Education use Salesforce and Pardot for marketing and management of its certificate programs. Staff occasionally need to view course payment information that they can access in a separate transaction system. The system admin wants Salesforce to contain only CRM data for reports and automation.

Which data management strategy should the consultant recommend for course payment information?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sina
4 months ago
Is it really a good idea to keep payments separate? Just asking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
Option B could work too, but it complicates things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
4 months ago
Wait, why would we migrate payments to Salesforce? Seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
4 months ago
Totally agree, keeping it in the transaction system is cleaner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
4 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
5 months ago
I’m torn between A and B. I think migrating everything to Salesforce could be overkill, but managing payments in Pardot seems risky too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
5 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where managing data in the original system was preferred. So, option C could be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think integrating with the transaction system could create more complexity. Option D might not be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
I remember we discussed keeping CRM data clean, so maybe option C makes sense to avoid cluttering Salesforce with payment info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B because it seems like it would allow for better tracking, but I’m not confident about the implications of managing payments in two systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
5 months ago
I think we had a similar question about data management strategies, and I remember that managing everything in one system can lead to issues. Option C sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like integrating the systems could create more complexity. Maybe option C is safer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
5 months ago
I remember we discussed keeping CRM data separate from financial data in one of our practice sessions. I think option C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the issue is the number of charts, the resistance to automation, the misapplication of results, or the reduced training needed. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
5 months ago
There was a practice question similar to this, and I believe it talked about NLRI and path attributes in detail, which makes me think it might be related.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The for loop is iterating from l to 100, so I need to find a stream method that can generate that range. Then I'll need to apply the FizzBuzz conversion and print the results. I've got a strategy, let's see if I can execute it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
5 months ago
The Schedule States Report sounds like it would be the best fit for this question. It's the only one that specifically mentions showing the total time spent in various states.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel