New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce DEX-450 Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's DEX-450 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All DEX-450 Questions]

While writing an Apex class, a developer wants to make sure that all functionality being developed is handled as specified by the requirements.

Which approach should the developer use to be sure that the Apex class is working according to specifications?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Linn
4 months ago
C is definitely the best way to ensure everything works right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
4 months ago
Wait, are we really considering try/catch for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
4 months ago
Not sure about D, seems a bit overkill for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
4 months ago
I think B is a good option too, quick testing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
4 months ago
Gotta go with C, test classes are essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
Including a savepoint and rollback seems like a good safety net, but I’m not convinced it actually verifies if the class works as intended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
5 months ago
I recall a similar question where running code in Execute Anonymous was mentioned, but I feel like that’s more for quick tests rather than full validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about using try/catch blocks for error handling. Would that help with functionality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
5 months ago
I think creating a test class is the best way to ensure the Apex class meets the requirements. It’s what we practiced in our last session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this question. I know the settings are important for managing access, but I'm not totally sure which three are the most relevant. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the organization hires more experienced (and likely higher-paid) researchers, that would lead to an adverse labor rate variance. And since the more experienced researchers may be more efficient, that could result in a favorable labor efficiency variance. So I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel