Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce DEX-450 Exam - Topic 10 Question 82 Discussion

When the code executes, a DML exception is thrown.How should a developer modify the code to ensure exceptions are handled gracefully?
C) Implement a try/catch block for the DML.
A) Implement the upsert DML statement.
B) Implement Change Data Capture.
D) Remove null items from the list of Accounts.

Salesforce DEX-450 Exam - Topic 10 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's DEX-450 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 10
[All DEX-450 Questions]

When the code executes, a DML exception is thrown.

How should a developer modify the code to ensure exceptions are handled gracefully?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Harrison at Jan 28, 2024, 01:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DEX-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Pete
9 months ago
Change Data Capture? That's not even related here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
10 months ago
C is the best choice, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
10 months ago
Wait, does removing nulls really fix the issue? Sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
10 months ago
I think A could work too, but not for all cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
10 months ago
Definitely go with C, try/catch is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
10 months ago
Change Data Capture sounds familiar, but I can't recall how it relates to handling DML exceptions. I think it's more for tracking changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
11 months ago
I feel like removing null items could help, but it doesn't really address the exception handling part directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think upsert might be more about data integrity than exception handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
11 months ago
I remember we discussed using try/catch blocks to handle exceptions in our last practice session. It seems like a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if the upsert DML statement (Option A) or the try/catch block (Option C) is the better approach here. I'll need to review the differences between those two options and decide which one is more appropriate for handling the DML exception.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
11 months ago
I think the best solution here is to implement a try/catch block to handle the DML exception. That way, I can catch the exception and take appropriate action, like logging the error or retrying the operation. Option C seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
11 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Does the upsert DML statement (Option A) also handle the exception, or is a try/catch block (Option C) the better approach? I'll need to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to implement a try/catch block to properly handle the DML exception. Option C looks like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward exception handling question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think about the best way to gracefully handle the DML exception.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
11 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. Increasing the rate will make the progress bar finish more quickly, so I'm going to go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the concept of bridge groups on Cisco FTD. I'll need to review my notes to refresh my memory on how they work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
11 months ago
This is tricky! I thought decentralized meant no central authority, which might not apply to every distributed setup. Could it be True?
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
2 years ago
Implement a try/catch block? Pfft, real developers use duct tape and chewing gum to fix their code! But in all seriousness, C is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
Mignon
2 years ago
Definitely, it's important to handle exceptions gracefully in code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 years ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 years ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Using a try/catch block is the best way to handle exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colton
2 years ago
I was thinking D, removing null items from the list of Accounts, but then I realized that doesn't actually handle the exception. You're right, C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Antonette
2 years ago
C) Implement a try/catch block for the DML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 years ago
B) Implement Change Data Capture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
2 years ago
A) Implement the upsert DML statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terrilyn
2 years ago
C is the way to go! Handling exceptions with a try/catch block is the best way to ensure graceful error handling.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
2 years ago
Agreed, that's the best way to handle exceptions gracefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
2 years ago
I think we should implement a try/catch block for the DML.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel