Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce DEX-450 Exam - Topic 10 Question 54 Discussion

Universal Containers (UC) uses a custom object called Vendor. The Vendor custom object has a master-detail relationship with the standard Account object.Based on some internal discussions, the UC administrator tried to change the master-detail relationship to a lookup relationship, but was not able to do so.What is a possible reason that this change was not permitted?
C) The Account object has a roll-up summary field on the Vendor object.
A) The Account object does not allow changing a field type for a custom field.
B) The organization wide default for the Vendor object is Public Read/Write.
D) Some of the Vendor records have null for the Account field.

Salesforce DEX-450 Exam - Topic 10 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's DEX-450 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 10
[All DEX-450 Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) uses a custom object called Vendor. The Vendor custom object has a master-detail relationship with the standard Account object.

Based on some internal discussions, the UC administrator tried to change the master-detail relationship to a lookup relationship, but was not able to do so.

What is a possible reason that this change was not permitted?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tarra at May 26, 2022, 02:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DEX-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lashaunda
7 months ago
B doesn’t affect relationship types, so it’s not the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
7 months ago
A is not the issue; custom fields can be changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
7 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? I thought null records could be a reason too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
8 months ago
I agree, C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
8 months ago
C is definitely the reason. Roll-up summary fields can’t exist with lookup relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
8 months ago
I thought the organization-wide defaults could affect field types, but I’m not confident that’s the main reason in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the relationship type couldn't be changed due to roll-up summaries. Could that be the case here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
8 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think if there are null values in the master field, that might prevent the change too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
8 months ago
I remember that changing a master-detail to a lookup can be tricky, especially if there are roll-up summary fields involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
8 months ago
Alright, let's do this. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out. I just need to make sure I understand the requirements correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
8 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. The Service Provider Admin Portal and the vCloud API are the two options that make the most sense for creating Provider VDCs. I'm feeling pretty confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
8 months ago
I remember practicing questions about HIDS before, but it seems more about detecting than blocking, right? So maybe it's not that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident it uses IP addresses and possibly protocol IDs, like we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel