New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers' org is complex but well-organized in unlocked packages with

their dependencies. The development team was asked for a new feature, and the package that

will be changed has already been identified.

Which environment should be used for this development?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Dahlia at Nov 18, 2024, 03:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Margurite
3 months ago
I agree with C, it keeps everything organized and manageable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
3 months ago
Wait, can you really use a scratch org for this? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
3 months ago
A Developer Pro sandbox is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
I think D could work too, but not sure it's ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
4 months ago
C is the best choice for focused development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m a bit confused about whether all dependencies need to be installed in a Developer Pro sandbox for this kind of development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like using a scratch org could be beneficial for testing new features without affecting existing ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
4 months ago
I think a Developer Pro sandbox would be safer since it has all the dependencies already set up, but I can't recall if that's the best option for new features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
I remember that scratch orgs are great for isolated development, but I'm not sure if they support all installed packages like a sandbox does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards C. Seems like the most efficient approach - I can just work on the package that needs updating without all the extra noise. As long as the dependencies are covered, that should give me what I need to get the job done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
5 months ago
Option B, a scratch org with all installed packages, seems like the safest bet to me. That way I know I'm testing in a fully representative environment, even if it's a bit more setup work upfront. Can't afford any surprises when implementing this new feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure here. I'm thinking maybe a scratch org would be better since it's a clean environment, but then again the question says the org is well-organized, so maybe a Developer Pro sandbox is the way to go. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
5 months ago
This seems straightforward - I'd go with option C, a Developer Pro sandbox with just the package that needs to be changed and its dependencies. That way I can focus on the specific code that needs updating without all the extra clutter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
1 year ago
Wow, this question is a real head-scratcher. I'll flip a coin and go with C. Heads or tails, it's all the same to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
Hold up, did someone say 'scratch org'? That's my jam! I'm going with D, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Gregoria
1 year ago
User 2: I prefer a scratch org with the package code that will be changed and its dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should use a Developer Pro sandbox with all packages installed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
1 year ago
But wouldn't a scratch org with the specific package code and dependencies be more efficient for this development?
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 year ago
A Developer Pro sandbox? Psh, that's overkill. B all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
1 year ago
C is the way to go! No need for all the extra packages, just focus on what's needed.
upvoted 0 times
Evette
1 year ago
Exactly, no need to clutter the environment with unnecessary packages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
Exactly, no need to complicate things with unnecessary packages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
1 year ago
That makes sense, keeping it simple and focused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 year ago
Using a Developer Pro sandbox with the package code and its dependencies installed makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
1 year ago
Agreed, it's more efficient to just focus on the package that needs to be changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
1 year ago
C) A Developer Pro sandbox with the package code that will be changed and its dependencies installed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 year ago
I think C is the best option for this development.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
1 year ago
I agree, using a Developer Pro sandbox with the package code and its dependencies installed makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel