New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 4 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers would like to conduct performance testing on its new major release. What three things should the architect consider when discussing performance testing?

Choose 3 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

by Mendy at Sep 17, 2024, 07:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dottie
3 months ago
Not sure about running tests without notice... sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
3 months ago
Salesforce monitors test activity, that's good to know!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
3 months ago
Wait, do we really need a business justification?
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
4 months ago
Totally agree, sandbox testing is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
4 months ago
A must inform Salesforce 7 days ahead!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
I feel like there was something about needing a business justification to run performance testing, but I can't remember the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
4 months ago
I practiced a question about running performance tests in a sandbox, and I believe that's definitely a requirement we should consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
4 months ago
I remember that Salesforce monitors the test activity, but I can't recall if that's for all tests or just specific ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
5 months ago
I think we need to inform Salesforce at least 7 days before starting the tests, but I'm not completely sure if that's the only requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
5 months ago
This is straightforward. The right approach is to run the tests in a sandbox, get Salesforce approval, and understand their monitoring capabilities. I'm confident I can select the correct 3 answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Do we really need to inform Salesforce 7 days in advance? That seems excessive. Let me re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key things to consider are making sure we run the tests in a sandbox, get Salesforce approval, and understand their monitoring and logging capabilities. I think I can nail this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know performance testing is important, but I'm not sure of the specific Salesforce requirements. I'll need to double-check the documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the key considerations for performance testing on Salesforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
5 months ago
Identifying stakeholders early is crucial to ensure the project meets their needs and expectations. I'll focus on that in my response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
1 year ago
I agree with Giovanna, option C is the way to go. Sandbox testing is the safest approach for performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
1 year ago
Yes, sandbox testing can help prevent any negative impact on production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
It's important to consider the environment when conducting performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I agree, running performance tests in a sandbox is definitely safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice for performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 year ago
E) Performance tests may be run without advanced notice, but Salesforce will not store performance logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
C) Performance tests must be run in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
1 year ago
A) Salesforce must be informed at least 7 days before starting performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammy
1 year ago
Haha, option E is a bit of a joke, right? Salesforce not storing performance logs? Come on, they're not that careless.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, they wouldn't just skip storing performance logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 year ago
I agree, Salesforce is pretty thorough with their logging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 year ago
Yeah, option E does seem a bit unrealistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
1 year ago
I believe performance tests should be run in a sandbox to accurately reflect real-world conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
1 year ago
I agree with that. It's important to have Salesforce monitor the test activity to ensure no issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
Option D is a good one. Providing a business justification is a smart move before running performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
1 year ago
Yolande: Absolutely. It's important to have a justification for the resources being used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 year ago
User 3: Option D is a must. It shows that the tests are being done for a valid reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 year ago
User 2: I agree. It helps to have a clear purpose before conducting any tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 year ago
Option D is definitely important. It's good to have a solid reason for running performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option A. Informing Salesforce 7 days in advance seems a bit excessive.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
1 year ago
But do you think 7 days in advance is too much? Maybe a shorter notice would suffice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
1 year ago
I agree, it's better to give them a heads up so they can monitor the test activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
1 year ago
Option A may be necessary to ensure Salesforce is prepared for the performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Staci
1 year ago
I think the architect should consider informing Salesforce before starting performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 year ago
Option B sounds reasonable, as Salesforce should monitor the tests to ensure there are no issues with their services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Running performance tests in a sandbox is important to ensure the production environment is not impacted.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
1 year ago
I agree with both of you. Option C seems to be the most logical choice for conducting performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
1 year ago
Yes, it's definitely a best practice to conduct performance testing in a controlled environment like a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
I think option C is a good choice too. It's important to consider the potential impact on the live system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
1 year ago
I agree, running performance tests in a sandbox is crucial to avoid impacting the production environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel