Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Topic 10 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 10
[All Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) innovative apps division is releasing an application that can

be installed in its trading partners Salesforce environments. The application lets the trading

partners book containers from UC directly without leaving their own Salesforce environment.

The partners can then build on top of the application with process builders and triggers so the

container booking process can be integrated with the trading partners' own processes.

What is the recommended mechanism for releasing the application considering the innovative

apps division wants to keep the application up to date in various environments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Emilio
10 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: how do you keep your containers from escaping their Salesforce environments? Managed package, of course!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
10 months ago
Managed package - the only way to ensure a truly 'universal' container booking experience!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
10 months ago
Zip file deployable by SFDX or ANT? What is this, the dark ages? Managed package is the modern, supported solution.
upvoted 0 times
Mira
10 months ago
I agree, managed package is the best choice for keeping the application up to date in different environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
10 months ago
Managed package is definitely the way to go. It's the most reliable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gwen
11 months ago
Unmanaged package? Are they trying to create a wild west of Salesforce apps? Managed package is the way to go, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
11 months ago
It's got to be C. Managed packages ensure trading partners get updates easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
11 months ago
I'd go with a managed package too. That way, the partners can easily install updates without disrupting their processes.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
10 months ago
I'd go with a managed package too. That way, the partners can easily install updates without disrupting their processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
10 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
10 months ago
B) Unmanaged package
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
10 months ago
A) Change sets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
11 months ago
Managed package all the way! That's the best way to keep the app updated across multiple environments.
upvoted 0 times
Una
10 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
10 months ago
A) Change sets
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
10 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
11 months ago
A) Change sets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
12 months ago
I was confused at first, but managed packages make sense for updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
12 months ago
I agree. Managed packages are better for version control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
12 months ago
C) Managed package seems right. Keeps the app updated, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
12 months ago
Yes, pretty interesting. I think the answer is C) Managed package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
1 years ago
Wow, did you see the question about UC's innovative app?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
1 years ago
Unmanaged packages might cause issues when updating the application in different environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
1 years ago
What about using Unmanaged packages instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 years ago
Yes, I agree. Managed packages ensure that the application can be easily updated in various environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
1 years ago
I think the recommended mechanism for releasing the application would be a Managed package.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel