New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 10 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 10
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) has been using Salesforce Sales Cloud for many years

following a highly customized, single-org strategy with great success so far.

What two reasons can justify a change to a multi-org strategy?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Tawna at Jan 27, 2024, 01:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Karl
3 months ago
C just complicates things, why not keep it unified?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
3 months ago
D is surprising! Didn't think acquisitions would push for multi-org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
4 months ago
B seems off, collaboration can still happen in a single org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
4 months ago
Totally agree, especially with new lines of business!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
4 months ago
A is a solid reason for a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
4 months ago
The scenario with the acquired company sounds familiar. Different regulatory requirements definitely justify a separate org, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
4 months ago
I practiced a question about unifying processes across business units, but I don't think that applies here. A multi-org strategy seems more about independence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think using Chatter to improve collaboration could be a reason too. It seems like it would help break down silos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
5 months ago
I remember discussing how a new line of business could complicate things in a single-org setup. A multi-org strategy might be necessary for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the options. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the strategies before selecting my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to identify situations where a multi-org strategy makes sense, like launching a new line of business or acquiring a company with different requirements. I'll select A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
5 months ago
Hmm, not sure about this one. I need to think through the differences between a single-org and multi-org strategy. Let me re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key points - reasons to move to a multi-org strategy. Looks like A and D are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Do I need to find the probability of exactly one patient being cured, or the probability of at least one patient being cured? The wording of the question is a little unclear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
I definitely recall our instructor mentioning that these searches are required, not optional, so "nothing" can't be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
2 years ago
A and D are clear winners here. Gotta love those regulatory requirements, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option C was high on Chatter when they came up with that one. Definitely going with A and D.
upvoted 0 times
Katina
2 years ago
Yeah, A and D seem like the most practical reasons for switching to a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
2 years ago
I think A and D are the best options here. It's all about adapting to the changing needs of the business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
2 years ago
I agree, option C does sound a bit far-fetched. A and D make more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
2 years ago
Yeah, A and D make the most sense for UC's situation. It's important to consider the complexity of adding new features and regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
2 years ago
I agree, option C does sound a bit far-fetched. A and D seem like the most practical choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barabara
2 years ago
I disagree with option C. Unification is not a valid reason for a multi-org setup. B is a bit strange too, Chatter can be used across orgs.
upvoted 0 times
William
2 years ago
D) Acquired company that has its own Salesforce org and operates in a different business with its own set of regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
2 years ago
A) UC is launching a new line of business with independent processes and adding any new feature to it is too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chantell
2 years ago
A and D seem like the best options here. Launching a new line of business with different processes and acquiring a company with its own Salesforce org are good reasons to consider a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel