New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 1 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers has 80% code coverage. Despite the creation of a test plan for

each sprint, the number of defects is large.

What two items should the architect recommend to reduce defects?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Anastacia at Mar 20, 2025, 01:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Samira
2 months ago
Wait, 80% coverage and still so many defects? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
3 months ago
I disagree, it's not just about coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
3 months ago
Test scripts should definitely guide the test classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
3 months ago
More detailed acceptance criteria could help a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
3 months ago
Increasing code coverage to 95% is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
3 months ago
Using the test script to define test classes could streamline things, but I wonder if that’s enough to really reduce defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether the test analyst should also create the test classes. It seems like a lot of responsibility for one person.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question where the acceptance criteria were vague, leading to more defects. So, option D sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
4 months ago
I remember we discussed how increasing code coverage might help, but I'm not sure if 95% is the right target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
4 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The acceptance criteria definitely need more detail, and increasing the code coverage to 95% is a good way to catch more issues. I'll mark those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to focus on the test plan and test classes. The test script should be used to define the test classes, and the test analyst who creates the test plan should also create the test classes. That should help reduce the defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question is asking for two recommendations, but the options seem to be a mix of different approaches. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if increasing the code coverage to 95% is the best approach, since that might not necessarily reduce the number of defects. The acceptance criteria detail seems more promising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
11 months ago
I think both increasing code coverage and using test script for test classes are important to reduce defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 months ago
The test analyst who creates the test plan must also create the test classes? Hmm, I don't know about that. Seems like a bit of a stretch to me. Why not just have a dedicated test team handle that?
upvoted 0 times
Ruthann
9 months ago
B) The code coverage should be increased to 95%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
9 months ago
Having a dedicated test team could help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
9 months ago
D) The acceptance criteria should have more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
9 months ago
A) The test script should be used to define the test classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
9 months ago
B) The code coverage should be increased to 95%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
9 months ago
The test analyst creating the test plan should also create the test classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
10 months ago
D) The acceptance criteria should have more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
10 months ago
A) The test script should be used to define the test classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
11 months ago
I believe the test script should be used to define the test classes as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
11 months ago
I agree with Leigha. Higher code coverage can help reduce defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
11 months ago
The acceptance criteria should have more details? Yeah, that makes sense. Maybe the architect should also recommend investing in a good requirements management tool to keep everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
11 months ago
Increasing the code coverage to 95%? That sounds like a recipe for a never-ending testing cycle. Wouldn't it be better to focus on the quality of the tests rather than just the quantity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
11 months ago
The test script should be used to define the test classes? That's a new one! I think the architect needs to stick to the basics here.
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
10 months ago
D) The acceptance criteria should have more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
10 months ago
A) The test script should be used to define the test classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leigha
11 months ago
I think we should increase code coverage to 95%.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel