Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Data Architect Topic 5 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Architect exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 5
[All Data Architect Questions]

UC has migrated its Back-office data into an on-premise database with REST API access. UC recently implemented Sales cloud for its sales organization. But users are complaining about a lack of order data inside SF.

UC is concerned about SF storage limits but would still like Sales cloud to have access to the data.

Which design patterns should a data architect select to satisfy the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Creating validation rules to check if the required attributes are entered is the best option to mandate this when customers are created in Salesforce. Validation rules allow you to specify criteria that must be met before a record can be saved. You can use validation rules to ensure that customers have a first name, last name, and email when they are created in Salesforce. This way, you can prevent incomplete or invalid data from being sent to your MDM solution.


by Alecia at Apr 27, 2024, 06:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Data Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sylvie
1 months ago
Option F: Develop a secret handshake protocol to transfer the data between the systems. It'll be like a spy thriller, but with more spreadsheets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
1 months ago
Option E: Teach the sales team to use carrier pigeons to fetch the data from the on-premise system. No storage limits, and it's a great team-building exercise!
upvoted 0 times
Vanna
5 days ago
B) Use SF Connect to virtualize the data in SF and avoid storage limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
1 months ago
Option A might work, but I'm not sure I'd want to migrate all that data into Salesforce just to take advantage of the native functionality. Seems like a lot of overhead for the storage limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 months ago
Hmm, Option D seems interesting. Iframing the on-premise system in Salesforce could be a creative way to give the sales team the data they need without too much integration complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Alease
21 hours ago
It's a creative approach to address the data access issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
5 days ago
I agree, it could simplify things for the sales team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
1 months ago
Option D seems like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yolande
2 months ago
I would go with Option C. A bidirectional integration between the systems ensures that the data is always in sync, and it gives the sales team the access they need without compromising the on-premise system.
upvoted 0 times
Blair
11 days ago
I see your point, but with Option C, we can avoid storage limits and keep both systems updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
1 months ago
But wouldn't Option A be easier to implement? Just migrate the data into SF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice. It keeps the data in sync between systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marica
2 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. Virtualizing the data in Salesforce seems like the most efficient solution to avoid storage limits. Plus, it keeps the data secure in the on-premise system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option B is more efficient in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the way to go as it ensures a seamless integration between the systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice because it allows us to access the data without worrying about storage limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option B). I think option C) might be better as it allows for bidirectional integration between systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
2 months ago
I agree with Deeanna. Using SF Connect to virtualize the data seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
2 months ago
I think option B) sounds like a good idea. It would allow Sales cloud to access the data without worrying about storage limits.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel