New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 5 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) owns a complex Salesforce org with many Apex classes, triggers, and automated processes that will modify records if available. UC has identified that, in its current development state, UC runs change of encountering race condition on the same record.

What should a data architect recommend to guarantee that records are not being updated at the same time?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Using Bulk API to export 1 million records from Salesforce is the best option. Bulk API is a RESTful API that allows you to perform asynchronous operations on large sets of data. You can use Bulk API to create, update, delete, or query millions of records in batches. Bulk API is optimized for performance and scalability, and it can handle complex data loading scenarios.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Valentin
3 months ago
Wait, can FOR UPDATE really prevent all race conditions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
3 months ago
D won't help with race conditions, just performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
3 months ago
C sounds interesting, but will it really solve the issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
4 months ago
I disagree, B seems too extreme. Just optimize!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
4 months ago
A is definitely the way to go! FOR UPDATE is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
4 months ago
Refactoring for CPU performance sounds important, but I don't see how that directly prevents simultaneous updates on the same record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where migrating logic to flows seemed like a good option, but I wonder if it really addresses the race condition issue effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
4 months ago
I think disabling classes or triggers could lead to issues down the line, but it might be a quick fix for avoiding conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
I remember studying about using FOR UPDATE in SOQL to prevent race conditions, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best approach in every scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Disabling classes or triggers that could cause race conditions seems like it might work, but that could have unintended consequences. Migrating to processes and flows also seems risky. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this! The key here is to use the FOR UPDATE clause to lock the records and prevent race conditions. That's definitely the way to go. Option A is the clear winner in my mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know that race conditions can be a real challenge in complex Salesforce orgs, but I'm not sure which of these options would be the best recommendation. I'll need to review my notes and think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question about race conditions in Salesforce. I'll need to think carefully about the options and consider the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The key is to focus on the specific purpose of the document, which is to outline a professional services engagement for a cloud migration. I'm pretty confident the answer is B, Statement of work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a straightforward question about configuring HC. I'll need to think through the key steps carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I'm pretty sure the answer is D: Software as a Service. It makes the most sense given the definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
10 months ago
Migrating to processes and flows? Sounds like a smart move. It's like upgrading from a flip phone to a smartphone - more control and less headaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
10 months ago
Disabling classes or triggers? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet by turning off the water supply. Not very practical.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
8 months ago
C) Migrate programmatic logic to processes and flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
8 months ago
B) Disable classes or triggers that have the potential to obtain the same record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
A) Embed the keywords FOR UPDATE after SOQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
9 months ago
C) Migrate programmatic logic to processes and flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
9 months ago
B) Disable classes or triggers that have the potential to obtain the same record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
9 months ago
A) Embed the keywords FOR UPDATE after SOQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isadora
10 months ago
Embedding the 'FOR UPDATE' keyword seems like the obvious choice to me. It's like putting a 'do not disturb' sign on the record.
upvoted 0 times
Melvin
8 months ago
User 4: Migrating programmatic logic to processes and flows could be a good solution too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
8 months ago
User 3: Disabling classes or triggers that might access the same record could also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
8 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's like putting a 'do not disturb' sign on the record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
9 months ago
User 1: I think embedding the 'FOR UPDATE' keyword is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
10 months ago
Whoa, race conditions in a Salesforce org? That's like trying to herd cats while juggling chainsaws!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
10 months ago
But wouldn't migrating programmatic logic to processes and flows also help prevent race conditions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
10 months ago
I agree with Dorthy. That would ensure records are not updated at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
11 months ago
I think we should embed the keywords FOR UPDATE after SOQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel