Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Data Architect Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Architect exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All Data Architect Questions]

Universal Containers has successfully migrated 50 million records into five different objects multiple times in a full copy sandbox. The Integration Engineer wants to re-run the test again a month before it goes live into Production. What is the recommended approach to re-run the test?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

creating multiple similar products and distributing the skew across those products can be a way to mitigate issues related to lookup skew. The article explains that lookup skew happens when a very large number of records are associated with a single record in the lookup object, and this can cause record locking and performance issues. The article suggests creating multiple copies of the same product record and assigning different child records to each copy, so that the number of child records per parent record is reduced.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Corinne
1 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. Refreshing the sandbox ensures a clean slate and reliable test conditions. Now, where's the popcorn? This is going to be good.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
1 months ago
Analytical Ava
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
5 days ago
C) Hard delete all 5 objects' data and re-run the data migration test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
20 days ago
B) Refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the data migration test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
1 months ago
A) Truncate all 5 objects quickly and re-run the data migration test.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edgar
1 months ago
Ah, the old 'delete everything and start over' approach. Bold move, but I think I'll stick with the sandbox refresh. Less drama, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Marylou
13 days ago
Refreshing the full copy sandbox seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
15 days ago
I think truncating all 5 objects quickly could save time though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
20 days ago
I agree, a sandbox refresh sounds like the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Albina
2 months ago
I like how option B keeps the sandbox environment clean and ready for testing. Refreshing is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 months ago
Hard deleting the data? That's a bit extreme, don't you think? Refreshing the sandbox is the safest bet to ensure a reliable test run.
upvoted 0 times
Giovanna
5 days ago
B) Refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the data migration test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
12 days ago
A) Truncate all 5 objects quickly and re-run the data migration test.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
2 months ago
Truncating the objects sounds like a quick fix, but it doesn't address the potential data issues that could arise. Better to start fresh with a refreshed sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, wouldn't truncating the objects quickly be faster?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I agree with Georgiann, refreshing the sandbox would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
2 months ago
I think we should refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the test.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel