Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 4

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

Universal Containers has successfully migrated 50 million records into five different objects multiple times in a full copy sandbox. The Integration Engineer wants to re-run the test again a month before it goes live into Production. What is the recommended approach to re-run the test?

ATruncate all 5 objects quickly and re-run the data migration test.

BRefresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the data migration test.

CHard delete all 5 objects' data and re-run the data migration test.

DTruncate all 5 objects and hard delete before running the migration test.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

creating multiple similar products and distributing the skew across those products can be a way to mitigate issues related to lookup skew. The article explains that lookup skew happens when a very large number of records are associated with a single record in the lookup object, and this can cause record locking and performance issues. The article suggests creating multiple copies of the same product record and assigning different child records to each copy, so that the number of child records per parent record is reduced.

by Tammy at Jun 20, 2024, 08:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Janey

5 months ago

Surprised there's no mention of data integrity checks!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rozella

5 months ago

Wait, why not just refresh? B is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kami

5 months ago

Hard delete sounds risky. C might cause issues later.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rupert

5 months ago

I disagree, truncating is faster. A all the way!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

6 months ago

Option B seems like the safest bet. Refreshing is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Amos

6 months ago

I feel like option B makes the most sense, but I’m a bit confused about whether truncating or refreshing is better for data integrity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

6 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think hard deleting is more thorough, but it sounds like a lot of work compared to just truncating.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

6 months ago

I remember something about truncating data being faster, but I wonder if it really clears everything properly for a test like this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

6 months ago

I think refreshing the full copy sandbox might be the best option since it gives a clean slate, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

6 months ago

I'm a little concerned about the scale of this test, with 50 million records across multiple objects. I'll need to double-check the details and make sure I select the approach that will handle the volume effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

6 months ago

I think I've got a good handle on this. Truncating the objects quickly and then re-running the migration test sounds like the most efficient way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

6 months ago

Refreshing the full copy sandbox seems like the safest bet to me. That way, I can start with a clean slate and ensure the test is run properly without any lingering data issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dion

6 months ago

This seems like a straightforward data migration test, but I want to make sure I understand the best approach. I'll need to carefully review the options to determine the most efficient and effective way to re-run the test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aron

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between truncating and hard deleting the objects. I'll need to research those options more to make sure I select the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xuan

7 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

11 months ago

Option B is the clear winner here. Refreshing the sandbox ensures a clean slate and reliable test conditions. Now, where's the popcorn? This is going to be good.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glennis

12 months ago

Analytical Ava

upvoted 0 times

Stefanie

10 months ago

C) Hard delete all 5 objects' data and re-run the data migration test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylou

11 months ago

B) Refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the data migration test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

11 months ago

A) Truncate all 5 objects quickly and re-run the data migration test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edgar

12 months ago

Ah, the old 'delete everything and start over' approach. Bold move, but I think I'll stick with the sandbox refresh. Less drama, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Marylou

11 months ago

Refreshing the full copy sandbox seems like the most efficient choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

11 months ago

I think truncating all 5 objects quickly could save time though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abraham

11 months ago

I agree, a sandbox refresh sounds like the safer option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albina

12 months ago

I like how option B keeps the sandbox environment clean and ready for testing. Refreshing is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

12 months ago

Hard deleting the data? That's a bit extreme, don't you think? Refreshing the sandbox is the safest bet to ensure a reliable test run.

upvoted 0 times

Jesusa

10 months ago

C) Hard delete all 5 objects' data and re-run the data migration test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matilda

10 months ago

Refreshing the sandbox is the safest bet to ensure a reliable test run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Giovanna

10 months ago

B) Refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the data migration test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rickie

11 months ago

A) Truncate all 5 objects quickly and re-run the data migration test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pete

1 year ago

Truncating the objects sounds like a quick fix, but it doesn't address the potential data issues that could arise. Better to start fresh with a refreshed sandbox.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

1 year ago

I'm not sure, wouldn't truncating the objects quickly be faster?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

1 year ago

I agree with Georgiann, refreshing the sandbox would be the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiann

1 year ago

I think we should refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the test.

upvoted 0 times

...