Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

An Architect needs information about who is creating, changing, or deleting certain fields within the past four months.

How can the Architect access this information?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A master-detail field on VTOTime__c to Project__c is the data relationship that the data architect should use to support the requirement when creating the custom VTOTime__c object. A master-detail relationship creates a parent-child relationship between two objects, where the master record controls certain behaviors of the detail record, such as security, ownership, deletion, and roll-up summary fields. By using a master-detail field on VTOTime__c to Project__c, you can ensure that the ability to view or edit the VTOTime__c object is the same as the Project__c record, and that managers can see the total hours volunteered while viewing the Project__c record using a roll-up summary field.


by Dwight at Sep 13, 2024, 12:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawana
4 months ago
Wait, can you really track changes from four months ago?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
D is a bit extreme, right? Just restrict access instead!
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
4 months ago
C sounds a bit complicated, not sure if it's worth it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
5 months ago
I think B could work too, but it's more manual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
5 months ago
A is the best option for tracking changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
5 months ago
Removing permissions in option D seems unrelated to tracking changes. I don't think that's the right approach at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
I feel like exporting metadata could help, but I'm not confident that option C would give us the specific changes we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
5 months ago
I remember practicing something similar where we had to look at the setup audit trail. Option B might be the right choice, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
6 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if field history reports cover changes from the last four months specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
6 months ago
This question is testing our knowledge of field auditing and reporting. Based on the details provided, option A stands out as the most direct way to get the information the Architect needs. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
6 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. Exporting the setup audit trail or metadata could work, but it might be overkill. Creating a field history report seems like the most straightforward solution. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to look for an option that specifically mentions accessing field history over the past 4 months. I think option A is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure which option would be the most efficient way to get the field history details. Maybe I should review the material on field auditing and reporting again before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about accessing field history. I think option A is the best approach - creating a field history report should give me the information I need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
6 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is that denormalization is the process of rejoining relations that were previously decomposed. I'll go with that for my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
10 months ago
If I had a nickel for every time I had to track down who's been messing with the fields... Well, let's just say I'd have enough to buy a nice cup of coffee.
upvoted 0 times
Arlen
9 months ago
I feel your pain. It can be frustrating trying to figure out who's been making changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
9 months ago
C) After exporting the metadata, search it for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
10 months ago
B) After exporting the setup audit trail, find the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
10 months ago
A) Create a field history report for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beula
10 months ago
I'm with Frank on this one. The field history report is the way to go. Keeps things simple and to the point.
upvoted 0 times
Solange
9 months ago
C) After exporting the metadata, search it for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
9 months ago
B) After exporting the setup audit trail, find the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
A) Create a field history report for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
11 months ago
Haha, removing 'customize application' permissions from everyone else? That's one way to solve the problem, I guess, but it's a bit overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Ligia
10 months ago
C) After exporting the metadata, search it for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
10 months ago
B) After exporting the setup audit trail, find the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
11 months ago
A) Create a field history report for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nana
11 months ago
Exporting the setup audit trail and metadata both seem like a lot of extra work. I'd rather just run the field history report.
upvoted 0 times
Virgina
10 months ago
A) Create a field history report for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
11 months ago
C) After exporting the metadata, search it for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
11 months ago
B) After exporting the setup audit trail, find the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
A) Create a field history report for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frank
11 months ago
A field history report sounds like the most direct way to get the information I need. I'll give that a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
12 months ago
I think exporting the setup audit trail and finding the fields in question could also work, but it might take longer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
12 months ago
I agree with Doyle, that seems like the most efficient way to access that information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
12 months ago
I think the Architect should create a field history report for the fields in question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel