MENU
The app builder at Ursa Major Solar has just created a master-detail relationship between a parent object Galaxy__c and child object
Star__c.
What would be the effect of creating this type of relationship if users want to report on Galaxy__c with Star__c?
30 comments · newest first
TA
Tammara
7 months ago
B could work, but I prefer A for simplicity.
AL
Alonzo
7 months ago
I agree with Emily. A is the easiest choice.
CA
Carmelina
7 months ago
D is too complicated. Why create a new type?
CO
Corrinne
7 months ago
C sounds right. Automatic creation is a plus.
ID
Idella
7 months ago
I feel like B makes more sense. Custom types are better.
OL
Olive
8 months ago
Definitely option C, no need for extra steps!
YU
Yun
8 months ago
I think option A is misleading, it doesn't mention Galaxy__c specifically.
BR
Brandon
8 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? I thought we needed to create a custom report type.
JO
Joseph
9 months ago
Totally agree with option C! Makes reporting easier.
LE
Leontine
9 months ago
A Galaxy__c with Star__c report type will be automatically created.
CA
Caren
9 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Reporting on master-detail relationships can be a real galaxy-brain move.
SH
Sheridan
9 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Gotta love those custom report types!
SA
Salena
9 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking option D, but I can see how B is the better choice.
EV
Evette
9 months ago
I agree with Francis. Option B makes the most sense.
WI
Willodean
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the report types. I thought we might need to create a custom report type for the child object, but I can't recall the specifics.
VI
Virgina
10 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did about report types. I feel like option C might be the right answer since it mentions Galaxy__c with Star__c.
JU
Juan
10 months ago
I think I remember that when you create a master-detail relationship, it automatically allows for reporting on both objects, but I'm not sure which option that relates to.
JU
Julio
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the concepts around master-detail relationships and custom report types to make sure I understand the implications. But I think option D sounds right.
KA
Kathryn
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is D. A new custom report type will need to be created for Galaxy__c with Star__c, since the master-detail relationship is between those two objects.
FR
Francis
10 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. A new custom report type will need to be created for Star__c with lookup fields from Galaxy__c.
JA
Jacquline
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since it's a master-detail relationship, the report type would need to be for the parent object, which is Galaxy__c. So I'm going to go with option D.
EM
Emily
11 months ago
I think it's option A. Seems straightforward.
DO
Domonique
11 months ago
I remember something about how master-detail relationships simplify reporting, but I can't remember if that means we need to create a new report type or if it happens automatically.
WE
Wendell
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused. Is it option B or D? I'm not sure if the report type would be for Star__c or Galaxy__c.
LO
Louisa
12 months ago
I think I know the answer to this one. If there's a master-detail relationship, then a new custom report type would need to be created for Galaxy__c with Star__c.
RE
Ressie
6 months ago
Still, creating a custom report type seems necessary for Galaxy__c.
TI
Tien
6 months ago
I think the master-detail relationship simplifies reporting.
MA
Marvel
6 months ago
Yeah, I agree with you.
AL
Alica
7 months ago
I believe option D is correct.
SA
Sarina
11 months ago
But what about option C? That sounds plausible too.