New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CRT-403 Exam - Topic 5 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 5
[All CRT-403 Questions]

The app builder at Ursa Major Solar has just created a master-detail relationship between a parent object Galaxy__c and child object

Star__c.

What would be the effect of creating this type of relationship if users want to report on Galaxy__c with Star__c?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A master-detail relationship between two objects automatically creates a report type that includes both objects. The app builder does not need to create a custom report type for this scenario.The report type will have the format of Parent object with Child object


by Marsha at Nov 23, 2025, 04:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brandon
3 days ago
Wait, are you sure about that? I thought we needed to create a custom report type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
8 days ago
Totally agree with option C! Makes reporting easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
13 days ago
A Galaxy__c with Star__c report type will be automatically created.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
18 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Reporting on master-detail relationships can be a real galaxy-brain move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
24 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Gotta love those custom report types!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
29 days ago
Hmm, I was thinking option D, but I can see how B is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 month ago
I agree with Francis. Option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about the report types. I thought we might need to create a custom report type for the child object, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 month ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did about report types. I feel like option C might be the right answer since it mentions Galaxy__c with Star__c.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
2 months ago
I think I remember that when you create a master-detail relationship, it automatically allows for reporting on both objects, but I'm not sure which option that relates to.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the concepts around master-detail relationships and custom report types to make sure I understand the implications. But I think option D sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is D. A new custom report type will need to be created for Galaxy__c with Star__c, since the master-detail relationship is between those two objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
2 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. A new custom report type will need to be created for Star__c with lookup fields from Galaxy__c.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
2 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since it's a master-detail relationship, the report type would need to be for the parent object, which is Galaxy__c. So I'm going to go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
3 months ago
I think it's option A. Seems straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
3 months ago
I remember something about how master-detail relationships simplify reporting, but I can't remember if that means we need to create a new report type or if it happens automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused. Is it option B or D? I'm not sure if the report type would be for Star__c or Galaxy__c.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
3 months ago
I think I know the answer to this one. If there's a master-detail relationship, then a new custom report type would need to be created for Galaxy__c with Star__c.
upvoted 0 times
Sarina
3 months ago
But what about option C? That sounds plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel