Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CRT-101 Topic 7 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-101 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 7
[All CRT-101 Questions]

The administrator at cloud kicks is trying to debug a screen flow that create contacts. One of

the variables in the flow is missing on the debug screen.

What could cause this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

To use as an identifier when importing and updating records from a separate system, an administrator should use External ID field type on an object. External ID fields allow storing unique identifiers from external systems and using them for matching records during import or update operations. External ID fields can also be used for upsert operations that insert new records or update existing ones based on external ID values. For example, an administrator can create an External ID field on Account object that stores account numbers from an external ERP system and use it for importing or updating accounts from that system. Rich Text field, Record ID, and Auto-Number field are not suitable for using as identifiers when importing and updating records from a separate system. Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.fields_about_field_types.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.data_loader_upsert.htm&type=5


by Ettie at Dec 24, 2023, 03:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Nikita
2 days ago
Nah, it's gotta be option C. The field type being unsupported by debugging is a classic gotcha in these flow-related questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
7 days ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. If the available for output checkbox was unchecked, that could explain the missing variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
8 days ago
I think it could be because the available for output checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
9 days ago
I disagree, I believe the problem might be that the field type is unsupported by debugging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
10 days ago
I think the issue could be that the available for input checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
11 days ago
I think it's option A. The available for input checkbox being unchecked would definitely cause the variable to be missing on the debug screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
12 days ago
I'm not sure, but maybe the field type being unsupported by debugging could also be a possible cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
14 days ago
I agree with Lindsey, that could definitely cause the variable to be missing on the debug screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
16 days ago
I think the issue could be that the available for input checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel