Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CRT-101 Exam - Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

An administrator at Universal Containers has been asked to prevent users from accessing Salesforce from outside of their network.What are two considerations for this configuration?Choose 2 answers
A) IP address restrictions are set on the profile or globally for the org. and C) Enforce Login IP Ranges on Every Request must be selected to enforce IP restrictions.
B) Assign single sign-on to a permission set to allow users to log in when outside the network.
D) Restrict U2F Security Keys on the user's profile to enforce login hours.

Salesforce CRT-101 Exam - Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-101 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 5
[All CRT-101 Questions]

An administrator at Universal Containers has been asked to prevent users from accessing Salesforce from outside of their network.

What are two considerations for this configuration?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Caitlin at Jun 01, 2022, 11:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Thaddeus
9 months ago
A is good, but I’m not sure about the global settings part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
9 months ago
C is a must if you want to enforce those IP restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
Wait, can you really restrict access like that? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
9 months ago
I think B could be useful too, but not for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
9 months ago
A and C are definitely the right moves here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
9 months ago
I don't recall much about option D; it seems a bit off-topic since it's about security keys and not really about network access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
9 months ago
I feel like option C might be important too, especially if we want to enforce those IP restrictions on every request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
9 months ago
I'm not too sure about option B; I remember something about single sign-on, but it seems more related to authentication rather than restricting access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
10 months ago
I think option A is definitely a consideration since IP address restrictions are a common way to limit access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Restoring from backup and identifying the vulnerability are the critical steps to take when responding to a data breach. The other options are just distractions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking about which routers are responsible for pushing new labels for the two LSPs. Let me review the diagram and options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward capital budgeting question. I'll review the key concepts around capital budgeting decisions and then carefully consider each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. What exactly does it mean by "create a royalty contract and create monthly Accounts payable to the third party"? Do I need to set up some kind of recurring payment process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. The company needs to protect Windows 10 computers from malicious viruses, and also identify unauthorized cloud apps. I think the key is to identify the Microsoft Threat Protection solutions that cover both of those requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is TRUE, since the VRRP virtual IP address is meant to be shared by the redundant routers, and it makes sense for that to be the same as the interface IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
10 months ago
Hmm, the description of the attacker's technique sounds a lot like Fast-Flux DNS. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel