Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 4
[All CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant Questions]

A consultant is tasked with creating one query that shows how many opportunities and cases there are per account.

Cases and opportunities are found in two different datasets with a reference to the related Account via the AccoundId.

What options do the consultant have in Analytics Studio to create the query?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Milly at Aug 09, 2024, 01:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ashanti
9 months ago
I think both options could work, it just depends on how the consultant wants to structure the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
9 months ago
But with a cogroup statement, the consultant can combine the datasets based on the AccountId.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
9 months ago
I disagree, I believe a union statement would be more appropriate for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
9 months ago
I think the consultant can use a cogroup statement to create the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
10 months ago
I think a cogroup statement might be a better choice to combine the datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
10 months ago
I believe a union statement could also work to show opportunities and cases per account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
10 months ago
I agree with Elvera, a cogroup or union statement would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
10 months ago
As a consultant, I'd probably use a union statement. It's a classic 'how many X and Y per Z' kind of query, and union seems like the way to go. Although, a cogroup could work too. Decisions, decisions!
upvoted 0 times
Dyan
9 months ago
Yeah, a cogroup could work too, but I agree that a union statement is probably the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
9 months ago
I think a union statement would be the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tula
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards C, but I could also see D being a valid option. I guess it depends on the specific requirements of the consultant.
upvoted 0 times
Peggy
9 months ago
It really depends on the specific requirements of the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
9 months ago
I would go with D, a cogroup statement seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
9 months ago
I agree, a union statement would be the most appropriate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
10 months ago
I think C is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elvera
10 months ago
I think the consultant can use a cogroup or union statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
10 months ago
I'm going with B. A cogroup or union statement seems like the most logical approach to handle this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
11 months ago
D. A cogroup statement seems like the right choice here, as it would allow the consultant to group the data by AccountId and then work with the opportunities and cases separately.
upvoted 0 times
Margart
10 months ago
Yes, I agree. With a cogroup statement, the consultant can easily group the data by AccountId and analyze opportunities and cases separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
10 months ago
I think option D) A cogroup statement is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
11 months ago
I think the answer is C. A union statement would allow the consultant to combine the two datasets and get the required information.
upvoted 0 times
Elise
10 months ago
I believe a cogroup or union statement would be the most efficient way to create the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
10 months ago
I think a cogroup statement could also work to bring together the opportunities and cases per account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
10 months ago
I agree, a union statement would be the best option to combine the datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel