New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant (Analytics-Con-201) Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant (Analytics-Con-201) exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant (Analytics-Con-201) Questions]

Universal Containers' CRM Analytics team is building a dashboard with two widgets, and the queries use different datasets.

1. List widget associated to the query "Type_2" and grouped by the dimension "Type" (multi-selection)

2. Donut chart widget associated to the query "Query_pie_3" and grouped by the dimension "Type"

The team wants any selection in the List widget to filter the Donut chart and vice vers

a. Users should be able to choose more than one Type (multi-selection).

What is the recommended way to accomplish the required filtering?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jamie
3 months ago
Multi-selection is a must for this kind of dashboard!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
3 months ago
Wait, can you really filter both ways? That's cool!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
3 months ago
C sounds complicated, not sure it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
4 months ago
I think B might be better for interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
4 months ago
A is the way to go for mapping fields!
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
4 months ago
I feel like we did an exercise on filtering between widgets, and I thought it was about creating interactions. Option B seems like it could be the answer, but I’m not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to connect different datasets. I think option A could work, but I'm not confident about the mapping part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like we might need to set up interactions for both queries. Option C sounds familiar, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
5 months ago
I remember we discussed using selection-based interactions in class. I think option B might be the right choice for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
5 months ago
This question is testing our knowledge of dashboard interactions. I'm confident I can handle this - I'll use the "Connect Data Sources" option to map the fields between the two datasets and get the filtering working as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a plan. I'll start by creating the selection-based interaction between the two widgets. Then I'll make sure the multi-selection is enabled on the List widget. I think option C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The multi-selection requirement for the List widget makes it seem a bit more complex. I'll need to carefully review the options to make sure I understand the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is understanding how to set up the interaction between the two widgets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of Query ple 3. This is the way to go, unless you're feeling particularly adventurous and want to try the 'Connect Data Sources' approach. Just don't trip over your own feet, eh?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of Query ple 3. Easy peasy, just like filling out a fill-in-the-blank exam question.
upvoted 0 times
Ozell
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of 'Query ple 3'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
1 year ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Genevieve
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query. Gotta cover all the bases, you know? Better safe than sorry!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
1 year ago
A) Use Connect Data Sources to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets. That's the way to go, it's more robust than a selection-based interaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but maybe setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of Query ple 3. This seems like the most straightforward way to achieve the required filtering between the two widgets.
upvoted 0 times
Pilar
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply it to the query of 'Query_pie_3'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of Query ple 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 year ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donte
1 year ago
I agree with Alton, that seems like the most efficient way to accomplish the required filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 year ago
I think the recommended way is to use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel