Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CPQ-301 Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CPQ-301 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 4
[All CPQ-301 Questions]

Universal Containers wants to allow customers to return and receive credit for asset Products.

How should the admm meat the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by An at Aug 05, 2023, 04:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPQ-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Samira
2 days ago
Hold up, are we sure we can't just set the Quantity to a negative value? That would be a pretty slick solution. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
8 days ago
I'm not sure why we would need to edit the Quantity field on the Asset record. That seems like it could lead to data integrity issues. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
11 days ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to handle this requirement. Reducing the quantity on the amendment quote is the logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
12 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think both A) and B) could work depending on the specific scenario. We should consider the implications of each option before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
16 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and reduce the Quantity on the Amendment Quote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
20 days ago
I think the answer is A) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and set a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel