Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CPQ-301 Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CPQ-301 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 4
[All CPQ-301 Questions]

Universal Containers wants to allow customers to return and receive credit for asset Products.

How should the admm meat the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by An at Aug 05, 2023, 04:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPQ-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sabina
1 months ago
Wait, they want us to do what now? Return and receive credit for asset Products? I thought we were just selling widgets, not running a used car lot!
upvoted 0 times
Katie
5 days ago
Wait, they want us to do what now? Return and receive credit for asset Products? I thought we were just selling widgets, not running a used car lot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
13 days ago
B) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and reduce the Quantity on the Amendment Quote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
15 days ago
A) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and set a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelle
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Editing the Effective Quantity field on the Asset record? That's just asking for trouble. Option B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Sanda
5 days ago
Setting Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund and reducing the Quantity makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
6 days ago
Option B is definitely the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
1 months ago
I agree, editing the Effective Quantity field seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
2 months ago
Hold up, are we sure we can't just set the Quantity to a negative value? That would be a pretty slick solution. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Rikki
6 days ago
User 3: I'm not so sure about that. Maybe reducing the Quantity on the Amendment Quote would be better. Option B could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
11 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 months ago
User 1: I think setting a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote is the way to go. Option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malika
2 months ago
I'm not sure why we would need to edit the Quantity field on the Asset record. That seems like it could lead to data integrity issues. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, Option B seems like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, editing the Quantity field directly could cause problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wayne
2 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to handle this requirement. Reducing the quantity on the amendment quote is the logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think both A) and B) could work depending on the specific scenario. We should consider the implications of each option before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and reduce the Quantity on the Amendment Quote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and set a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel