Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Exam - Topic 4 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) exam

Question #: 28
Topic #: 4

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions]

At a project kickoff, a stakeholder shared the hypothesis that the price point was the reason their product was failing in the market. But when the design team conducted qualitative research, they learned that customers wanted an entirely different type of product.

How should the design team present this information knowing they would challenge a stakeholder's hypothesis?

AIn a walking deck with video clips from research sessions

BIn a 'How Might We' statement to encourage new ideas

CIn an insights workshop with plenty of time for group discussion

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

The least risky trend to influence the company's strategy for a health and wellness company that wants to create a 10-year vision for its business is perception shift: feelings toward the efficacy of wellness products in the next 10 years, as this is more likely to be stable and predictable than market shift or demographic shift, which are more volatile and uncertain.

by Dalene at Jul 18, 2024, 03:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

In

5 months ago

A workshop sounds great for collaboration and feedback.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barabara

5 months ago

Surprised they thought price was the issue at all!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

5 months ago

Not sure if that's the best way to present it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

5 months ago

Totally agree, visuals make a big impact!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

6 months ago

I think a walking deck would really engage everyone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcelle

6 months ago

I’m a bit torn between the options. The insights workshop sounds great for discussion, but I wonder if it might dilute the impact of the findings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

6 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to present conflicting data. I feel like a walking deck with video clips could be powerful, but it might come off as confrontational.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

6 months ago

I think using a 'How Might We' statement could help shift the focus to solutions rather than just challenging the hypothesis. It feels like a good way to open up the conversation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

6 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of presenting findings in a way that encourages collaboration. An insights workshop could be a good approach, but I'm not entirely sure if it would be the most effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

6 months ago

I feel pretty confident that option B, a 'How Might We' statement, would be the most effective approach here. It allows the design team to reframe the problem in a way that encourages new ideas and solutions, rather than just presenting their findings. That seems like the best way to navigate this delicate situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lennie

6 months ago

This seems like a tricky situation where the design team needs to carefully present their findings without directly challenging the stakeholder's hypothesis. I think option C, an insights workshop, could be a good approach to facilitate open discussion and get everyone on the same page.

upvoted 0 times

...

Artie

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the best way to handle this. On one hand, a walking deck with video clips could help bring the research to life and make it more compelling. But an insights workshop might allow for more dialogue and buy-in from the stakeholder. I'll have to think this through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

7 months ago

Brute force is the way to go here. It's the most thorough but also the most time-consuming method of password cracking. Gotta be ready to put in the work on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

7 months ago

I'm leaning towards the idea that starting with known information makes sense, but I can't recall if that's always the case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

7 months ago

Coercion dots are used for type conversion, not performance or memory optimization, so I'm going to select option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

12 months ago

Hold on, did the stakeholder say the product was failing because of the price point or because it was the wrong type of product? I'm so confused, someone please pass the aspirin.

upvoted 0 times

Monte

11 months ago

The stakeholder thought it was the price point, but customers actually want a different product.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivienne

11 months ago

C) In an insights workshop with plenty of time for group discussion

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelle

11 months ago

B) In a 'How Might We' statement to encourage new ideas

upvoted 0 times

...

Chu

12 months ago

A) In a walking deck with video clips from research sessions

upvoted 0 times

...

Rana

1 year ago

I'm going with Option C. Bringing the stakeholder into the discussion is key, and who doesn't love a good old-fashioned group therapy session?

upvoted 0 times

Alfreda

12 months ago

C) That sounds like a great approach. It's important to involve the stakeholder in the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lino

12 months ago

A) In an insights workshop with plenty of time for group discussion

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

1 year ago

A walking deck with video clips (Option A) could be engaging, but I'm not sure it would effectively challenge the stakeholder's hypothesis. The 'How Might We' statement (Option B) seems a bit too indirect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Starr

1 year ago

I think presenting the information in an insights workshop with group discussion would also be beneficial to ensure everyone is on the same page.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carole

1 year ago

I think the insights workshop with group discussion (Option C) is the best way to present the research findings. It allows the stakeholder to be involved in the process and encourages open dialogue.

upvoted 0 times