Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) exam

Question #: 42
Topic #: 1

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions]

A strategy designer is working with a product team to reach more diverse audiences.

How should the designer make a case for ensuring all future releases meet accessibility standards7

AEvaluate competitors' accessibility standards.

BFocus rationale on how refactoring later is more expensive.

CPlot accessibility standards against impact and difficulty.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The technique that the designer should use to ensure the audience remains engaged is to ask open-ended questions to the audience to maintain their involvement. Open-ended questions are questions that require more than a yes or no answer, and invite the audience to share their thoughts, opinions, or feedback. Asking open-ended questions can help the designer capture the audience's attention, interest, and curiosity, as well as encourage interaction and dialogue. Turning the camera off may reduce the visual connection and rapport with the audience. Dedicating half of the meeting time to answering questions may not be enough to keep the audience engaged throughout the presentation.

by Zona at Feb 07, 2025, 09:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aleshia

3 months ago

Evaluating competitors is a good start, but is it enough?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

3 months ago

C seems a bit vague, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

3 months ago

Isn't it surprising how many companies overlook this?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lura

4 months ago

Totally agree, refactoring can be a nightmare!

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

4 months ago

I think option B makes a lot of sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashley

4 months ago

I feel like emphasizing the long-term benefits of accessibility could be more persuasive than just comparing to competitors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alva

4 months ago

Plotting accessibility standards against impact and difficulty sounds like a solid approach, but I’m not clear on how to present that data effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheal

4 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to evaluate competitors' standards, but I wonder if that really helps in making a case for our own product.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

5 months ago

I think focusing on the cost of refactoring later makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the strongest argument.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantay

5 months ago

Plotting the accessibility standards against impact and difficulty seems like a smart way to build a data-driven case. That way we can prioritize the most important and feasible improvements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

5 months ago

I think the key here is to really drive home the long-term cost savings of building in accessibility from the start, rather than having to refactor later. That financial rationale could be a strong way to convince the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donette

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. Should we be looking at the impact and difficulty of meeting accessibility standards, or is that not the best approach here? I'm not totally clear on the best strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kasandra

5 months ago

This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on evaluating the competitors' accessibility standards and using that as a benchmark to make the case for improving our own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

10 months ago

Haha, the designer should also mention that accessibility is the 'ramp' to success in today's digital landscape!

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

10 months ago

Plotting the accessibility standards against impact and difficulty is a smart way to prioritize and communicate the efforts required.

upvoted 0 times

Christa

8 months ago

C) Plot accessibility standards against impact and difficulty.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerrod

9 months ago

B) Focus rationale on how refactoring later is more expensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Macy

9 months ago

A) Evaluate competitors' accessibility standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myra

10 months ago

Absolutely, highlighting the long-term cost savings of addressing accessibility upfront is a compelling argument.

upvoted 0 times

Nickolas

10 months ago

Absolutely, highlighting the long-term cost savings of addressing accessibility upfront is a compelling argument.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

10 months ago

A) Evaluate competitors' accessibility standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

11 months ago

I believe plotting accessibility standards against impact and difficulty can also help make a strong case for ensuring all future releases meet accessibility standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

11 months ago

I agree with Bettina. It's important to consider the cost implications of not meeting accessibility standards from the beginning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

11 months ago

I think we should focus on how refactoring later is more expensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

11 months ago

Focusing on the competitors' accessibility standards is a good starting point, but the designer should also emphasize the direct benefits to the users and the company.

upvoted 0 times