Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

A strategy designer is working with a product team to reach more diverse audiences.How should the designer make a case for ensuring all future releases meet accessibility standards7
C) Plot accessibility standards against impact and difficulty.
A) Evaluate competitors' accessibility standards.
B) Focus rationale on how refactoring later is more expensive.

Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions]

A strategy designer is working with a product team to reach more diverse audiences.

How should the designer make a case for ensuring all future releases meet accessibility standards7

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The technique that the designer should use to ensure the audience remains engaged is to ask open-ended questions to the audience to maintain their involvement. Open-ended questions are questions that require more than a yes or no answer, and invite the audience to share their thoughts, opinions, or feedback. Asking open-ended questions can help the designer capture the audience's attention, interest, and curiosity, as well as encourage interaction and dialogue. Turning the camera off may reduce the visual connection and rapport with the audience. Dedicating half of the meeting time to answering questions may not be enough to keep the audience engaged throughout the presentation.


by Zona at Feb 07, 2025, 09:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Aleshia
6 months ago
Evaluating competitors is a good start, but is it enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
6 months ago
C seems a bit vague, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
7 months ago
Isn't it surprising how many companies overlook this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
7 months ago
Totally agree, refactoring can be a nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
7 months ago
I think option B makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
7 months ago
I feel like emphasizing the long-term benefits of accessibility could be more persuasive than just comparing to competitors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
8 months ago
Plotting accessibility standards against impact and difficulty sounds like a solid approach, but I’m not clear on how to present that data effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
8 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to evaluate competitors' standards, but I wonder if that really helps in making a case for our own product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
8 months ago
I think focusing on the cost of refactoring later makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the strongest argument.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
8 months ago
Plotting the accessibility standards against impact and difficulty seems like a smart way to build a data-driven case. That way we can prioritize the most important and feasible improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
8 months ago
I think the key here is to really drive home the long-term cost savings of building in accessibility from the start, rather than having to refactor later. That financial rationale could be a strong way to convince the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. Should we be looking at the impact and difficulty of meeting accessibility standards, or is that not the best approach here? I'm not totally clear on the best strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
8 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on evaluating the competitors' accessibility standards and using that as a benchmark to make the case for improving our own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
1 year ago
Haha, the designer should also mention that accessibility is the 'ramp' to success in today's digital landscape!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
Plotting the accessibility standards against impact and difficulty is a smart way to prioritize and communicate the efforts required.
upvoted 0 times
Christa
12 months ago
C) Plot accessibility standards against impact and difficulty.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
12 months ago
B) Focus rationale on how refactoring later is more expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
1 year ago
A) Evaluate competitors' accessibility standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
1 year ago
Absolutely, highlighting the long-term cost savings of addressing accessibility upfront is a compelling argument.
upvoted 0 times
Nickolas
1 year ago
Absolutely, highlighting the long-term cost savings of addressing accessibility upfront is a compelling argument.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 year ago
A) Evaluate competitors' accessibility standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
1 year ago
I believe plotting accessibility standards against impact and difficulty can also help make a strong case for ensuring all future releases meet accessibility standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 year ago
I agree with Bettina. It's important to consider the cost implications of not meeting accessibility standards from the beginning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
I think we should focus on how refactoring later is more expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 year ago
Focusing on the competitors' accessibility standards is a good starting point, but the designer should also emphasize the direct benefits to the users and the company.
upvoted 0 times
Martina
1 year ago
The designer should highlight the cost savings of addressing accessibility early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 year ago
C) Plot accessibility standards against impact and difficulty.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
1 year ago
B) Focus rationale on how refactoring later is more expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
1 year ago
A) Evaluate competitors' accessibility standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel